Product comparison · 2 mice

GIGABYTE GM-M6800 mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI vs GIGABYTE GM-M7600 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 3identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

  • Device interface
    • GM-M6800 mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:USB Type-A
    • GM-M7600 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:RF Wireless
  • Movement resolution
    • GM-M6800 mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:1600 DPI
    • GM-M7600 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:800 DPI
  • Buttons quantity
    • GM-M6800 mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:6
    • GM-M7600 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:3
  • Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)
    • GM-M6800 mouse USB Type-A Optical 1600 DPI:75 x 127 x 42 mm
    • GM-M7600 mouse RF Wireless Optical 800 DPI:66 x 109 x 38.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of GM-M6800, GM-M7600
16 specifications
Mouse4 differ
Device interfaceDiffersUSB Type-ARF Wireless
Movement resolutionDiffers1600 DPI800 DPI
Buttons quantityDiffers63
Frequency bandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 GHz
CertificationDiffersCE, FCC, BSMICE FCC BSMI Laser Product class I NCC
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 m
Cable lengthKnown for one1.5 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Number of batteries supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAAA
Other features2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 98/2000/ME/XP 32bit/VistaWindows 98/2000/ME/XP/Vista
Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)Differs75 x 127 x 42 mm66 x 109 x 38.5 mm
Receiver dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 x 21 x 8 mm
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one126 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons