Product comparison · 2 mice

GIGABYTE ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI vs GIGABYTE M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 3identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

  • Purpose
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:Gaming
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:Office
  • Device interface
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:RF Wireless
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:USB Type-A
  • Movement detection technology
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:Laser
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:Optical
  • Movement resolution
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:1600 DPI
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:800 DPI
  • Buttons quantity
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:7
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:2
  • Certification
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:CE, FCC, BSMI, NCC
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:CE, FCC, BSMI
  • Form factor
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:Right-hand
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:Ambidextrous
  • Width
    • ECO600 mouse Gaming Right-hand RF Wireless Laser 1600 DPI:78 mm
    • M5050S mouse Office Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:59 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ECO600, M5050S
28 specifications
Mouse6 differ
PurposeDiffersGamingOffice
Device interfaceDiffersRF WirelessUSB Type-A
Movement detection technologyDiffersLaserOptical
Movement resolutionDiffers1600 DPI800 DPI
Scroll typeWheelWheel
Number of scroll wheelsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Buttons quantityDiffers72
ScrollKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Recommended usagePCPC
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCE, FCC, BSMI, NCCCE, FCC, BSMI
Buttons typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePressed buttons
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffersRight-handAmbidextrous
Product colourBlackBlack
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for one10 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.5 m
Poweridentical
Power sourceKnown for oneBatteriesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery typeKnown for oneAAUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows 8, Windows 8 Enterprise, Windows 8 Enterprise x64, WinWindows 7, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Basic x64, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Win
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers78 mm59 mm
DepthDiffers125 mm118 mm
HeightDiffers42 mm39 mm
WeightDiffers106 g88 g
Packaging contentidentical
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for oneUSB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver typeKnown for oneNano receiverUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Number of products includedKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons