Product comparison · 2 mice

Cudy 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0 vs R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 13identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Cudy 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0 has 200 DPI more movement resolution than the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI (1000 DPI vs 800 DPI). The R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI has 26 mm more width than the Cudy 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0 (86 mm vs 60 mm). The Cudy 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0 has 17 mm more depth than the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI (110 mm vs 93 mm). Only the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI has USB Type-C charging port. Connectivity technology: Wireless on the Cudy 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0, Wired & Wireless on the R-Go Tools RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI.

  • Connectivity technology
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:Wireless
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:Wired & Wireless
  • Movement resolution
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:1000 DPI
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:800 DPI
  • Product colour
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:Black
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:Black, Silver
  • Power source
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:Batteries
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:Batteries/Cable
  • USB Type-C charging port
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:No
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:Yes
  • Width
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:60 mm
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:86 mm
  • Depth
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:110 mm
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:93 mm
  • Height
    • 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0:38 mm
    • RGOWABMWLBL mouse Universal Ambidextrous RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C Optical 800 DPI:73 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2.4G Wireless Mouse, MS9922 1.0, RGOWABMWLBL
54 specifications
Mouse3 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWirelessWired & Wireless
Device interfaceDiffersRF WirelessRF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-C
Movement resolutionDiffers1000 DPI800 DPI
Polling rateKnown for one125 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Bluetooth versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.2
Design1 differ
Ergonomic designKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Silver
Surface colorationKnown for oneMonochromaticUnknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium, Plastic
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 m
Power2 differ
Power sourceDiffersBatteriesBatteries/Cable
Battery typeKnown for oneAAUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C charging portDiffersNoYes
RechargeableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Battery life (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 h
Battery recharge timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 h
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IoT Enterprise, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 10 x64, Windows 11, Windows 11 Enterprise, Windows 11 EnterpYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers60 mm86 mm
DepthDiffers110 mm93 mm
HeightDiffers38 mm73 mm
WeightDiffers49 g96 g
Packaging dataidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one43 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one78 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one115 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one94 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for oneUSB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
User guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one415 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one465 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one250 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one10.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for one9.4 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Batteryidentical
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source230 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons