Product comparison · 2 mice

Cherry M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI vs Cherry M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI

9specifications compared
5differ
4identical
31known for one product only

Key differences

Device interface
- M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI:USB Type-A + PS/2
- M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI:RF Wireless
Buttons quantity
- M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI:3
- M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI:5
Power consumption
- M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI:35 mA
- M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI:25 mA
Storage temperature (T-T)
- M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI:-15 - 60 °C
- M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI:-20 - 60 °C
Weight
- M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI:135 g
- M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI:90 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of M-5410, M-8000
40 specifications	A Cherry M-5410 mouse USB Type-A + PS/2 Optical 1000 DPI Model M-5410 View product	B Cherry M-8000 mouse Office Ambidextrous RF Wireless Optical 1000 DPI Model M-8000 View product
Mouse2 differ
PurposeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Office
Device interfaceDiffers	USB Type-A + PS/2	RF Wireless
Scroll typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wheel
Buttons quantityDiffers	3	5
Buttons typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Pressed buttons
Recommended usageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Universal
Frequency bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.400 - 2.4835 GHz
ScrollKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Ambidextrous
Ergonomic designKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Brown
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 m
Cable lengthKnown for one	1.8 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Batteries
RechargeableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AAA
Power consumptionDiffers	35 mA	25 mA
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditions1 differ
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs	-15 - 60 °C	-20 - 60 °C
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 mm
WeightDiffers	135 g	90 g
Receiver weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 g
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	215 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 mm
Package weightKnown for one	155 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A
User guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Other featuresidentical
Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	120 x 65 x 40 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	136 x 89 x 48 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons