Product comparison · 2 mice

BenQ U2-DW (M) vs Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI

13specifications compared
5differ
8identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

The Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI has 20,800 DPI more movement resolution than the BenQ U2-DW (M) (24000 DPI vs 3200 DPI). The Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI has 9 more buttons quantity than the BenQ U2-DW (M) (16 vs 7). The Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI has 39 g more weight than the BenQ U2-DW (M) (99 g vs 60 g). Connectivity technology: Wireless on the BenQ U2-DW (M), Wired on the Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI. Device interface: RF Wireless on the BenQ U2-DW (M), Bluetooth on the Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI.

Connectivity technology
- U2-DW (M):Wireless
- MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI:Wired
Device interface
- U2-DW (M):RF Wireless
- MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI:Bluetooth
Movement resolution
- U2-DW (M):3200 DPI
- MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI:24000 DPI
Buttons quantity
- U2-DW (M):7
- MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI:16
Weight
- U2-DW (M):60 g
- MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI:99 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of U2-DW (M), MMWHEX16
31 specifications	A BenQ U2-DW (M)View product	B Mars Gaming MMWHEX16 mouse Right-hand Bluetooth Optical 24000 DPI Model MMWHEX16 View product
Mouse4 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wireless	Wired
Device interfaceDiffers	RF Wireless	Bluetooth
Movement resolutionDiffers	3200 DPI	24000 DPI
Buttons quantityDiffers	7	16
Number of scroll wheelsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Polling rateKnown for one	125,500,1000,2000,4000 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandKnown for one	2.4 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 W
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.5 W
RechargeableKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery life (max)Known for one	80 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 mm
WeightDiffers	60 g	99 g
Receiver widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.85 cm
Receiver depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 cm
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	52 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	115 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	177 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	226 g
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Spain
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons