Product comparison · 2 mice

BenQ MD300 mouse USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI vs Kensington Ci95m Wireless Mouse with Nano receiver

4specifications compared
3differ
1identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

Device interface
- MD300 mouse USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:USB Type-A
- Ci95m Wireless Mouse with Nano receiver:RF Wireless
Movement detection technology
- MD300 mouse USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:Optical
- Ci95m Wireless Mouse with Nano receiver:Laser
Buttons quantity
- MD300 mouse USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI:3
- Ci95m Wireless Mouse with Nano receiver:2

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MD300, Ci95m Wireless Mouse with Nano receiver
10 specifications	A BenQ MD300 mouse USB Type-A Optical 800 DPI Model MD300 View product	B Kensington Ci95m Wireless Mouse with Nano receiver View product
Mouse3 differ
Device interfaceDiffers	USB Type-A	RF Wireless
Movement detection technologyDiffers	Optical	Laser
Movement resolutionKnown for one	800 DPI	Unknown — not stated by the source
Buttons quantityDiffers	3	2
Scroll	Yes	Yes
Frequency bandKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2.4 GHz
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Windows 98SE, 2000, ME, XP, Vista	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	95 x 64 x 27.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons