Product comparison · 2 mice

ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace vs iggual WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI

22specifications compared
13differ
9identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace has 64,000 DPI more movement resolution than the iggual WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI (65000 DPI vs 1000 DPI). The ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace has 32.5 mm more width than the iggual WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI (127.5 mm vs 95 mm). The ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace has 5.7 mm more depth than the iggual WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI (67.7 mm vs 62 mm). Only the ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace has rechargeable. Only the ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace has USB Type-C charging port.

Purpose
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Gaming
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:Office
Connectivity technology
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Wired & Wireless
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:Wireless
Movement resolution
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:65000 DPI
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:1000 DPI
Form factor
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Right-hand
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:Ambidextrous
Power source
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Batteries/Cable
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:Batteries
Rechargeable
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Yes
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:No
Battery type
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Built-in battery
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:AAA
USB Type-C charging port
- ROG Gladius IV Ace:Yes
- WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ROG Gladius IV Ace, WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI
44 specifications	A ASUS ROG Gladius IV Ace View product	B iggual WOM-STANDARD-3D 1000DPI View product
Mouse4 differ
PurposeDiffers	Gaming	Office
Connectivity technologyDiffers	Wired & Wireless	Wireless
Device interfaceDiffers	RF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-A	RF Wireless
Movement resolutionDiffers	65000 DPI	1000 DPI
Programmable mouse buttonsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Buttons durability (million clicks)Known for one	100	Unknown — not stated by the source
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Polling rateKnown for one	8000 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandKnown for one	2.4 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	6.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Buttons quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffers	Right-hand	Ambidextrous
Ergonomic designKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Surface colorationKnown for one	Monochromatic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lengthKnown for one	2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Customizable weightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power4 differ
Power sourceDiffers	Batteries/Cable	Batteries
RechargeableDiffers	Yes	No
Battery typeDiffers	Built-in battery	AAA
USB Type-C charging portDiffers	Yes	No
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10, Windows 11	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Android
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	127.5 mm	95 mm
DepthDiffers	67.7 mm	62 mm
HeightDiffers	44.1 mm	28 mm
WeightKnown for one	56 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	163 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	119 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	101.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	540 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-A

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons