Product comparison · 2 mice

ASUS MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI vs Cudy Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 13identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The Cudy Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0 has 8,400 DPI more movement resolution than the ASUS MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI (10000 DPI vs 1600 DPI). The Cudy Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0 has 3 more movement resolution modes than the ASUS MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI (6 vs 3). The ASUS MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI has 56.9 mm more width than the Cudy Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0 (118.9 mm vs 62 mm). Only the Cudy Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0 has USB Type-C charging port. Connectivity technology: Wireless on the ASUS MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI, Wired & Wireless on the Cudy Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0.

  • Connectivity technology
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:Wireless
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:Wired & Wireless
  • Movement resolution
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:1600 DPI
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:10000 DPI
  • Number of movement resolution modes
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:3
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:6
  • Form factor
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:Right-hand
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:Ambidextrous
  • Product colour
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:Grey
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:Black
  • Power source
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:Batteries
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:Batteries/Cable
  • USB Type-C charging port
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:No
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:Yes
  • Width
    • MD102 mouse Universal Right-hand RF Wireless + Bluetooth Optical 1600 DPI:118.9 mm
    • Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0:62 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of MD102, Tri-Mode Wireless Mouse, MS9891 1.0
58 specifications
Mouse4 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWirelessWired & Wireless
Device interfaceDiffersRF Wireless + BluetoothRF Wireless + Bluetooth + USB Type-A
Movement resolutionDiffers1600 DPI10000 DPI
Buttons quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6
Programmable mouse buttonsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of programmable buttonsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5
Button functionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDPI switch, Back, Forward, Mode
Mouse tracking speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 ips
Number of movement resolution modesDiffers36
Acceleration (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 G
Polling rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source500 Hz
Sensor typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePAW3325
Buttons durability (million clicks)Known for one10Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffersRight-handAmbidextrous
Product colourDiffersGreyBlack
Power2 differ
Power sourceDiffersBatteriesBatteries/Cable
RechargeableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBuilt-in battery
USB Type-C charging portDiffersNoYes
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11Windows 10, Windows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IoT Enterprise, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 10 x64, Windows 11, Windows 11 Enterprise, Windows 11 Enterp
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneChromeOSUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers118.9 mm62 mm
DepthDiffers66.5 mm119 mm
HeightDiffers42 mm38 mm
WeightDiffers69 g82 g
Receiver widthKnown for one1.99 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver depthKnown for one1.4 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver heightKnown for one6.6 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-A to USB Type-C
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source63 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source166 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source203 g
Packaging contentidentical
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-A
User guideKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source500 mAh
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS, CE, UKCA, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), VCCI, EAC
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source405 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source570 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source355 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source13.1 kg
Master (outer) case net weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12.2 kg
Ergonomicsidentical
Wireless rangeKnown for one10 mUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons