Product comparison · 2 mice

ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly vs Verbatim 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 9identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly has 3 more buttons quantity than the Verbatim 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical (6 vs 3). Connectivity technology: Wireless on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, Wired on the Verbatim 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical. Device interface: RF Wireless on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, USB Type-A on the Verbatim 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical. Form factor: Right-hand on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, Ambidextrous on the Verbatim 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical. Power source: Batteries on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, Cable on the Verbatim 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical.

  • Connectivity technology
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Wireless
    • 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical:Wired
  • Device interface
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:RF Wireless
    • 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical:USB Type-A
  • Buttons quantity
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:6
    • 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical:3
  • Form factor
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Right-hand
    • 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical:Ambidextrous
  • Power source
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Batteries
    • 70749 mouse Universal Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical:Cable

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of AC5102, 70749
28 specifications
Mouse3 differ
Connectivity technologyDiffersWirelessWired
Device interfaceDiffersRF WirelessUSB Type-A
Movement resolutionKnown for one1600 DPIUnknown — not stated by the source
Buttons quantityDiffers63
Buttons typeKnown for onePressed buttonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Customizable movement resolutionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of movement resolution modesKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Form factorDiffersRight-handAmbidextrous
Vertical designKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Surface colorationKnown for oneMonochromaticUnknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for oneAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomic designKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power sourceDiffersBatteriesCable
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery typeKnown for oneAAUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for oneUSB Type-AUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver typeKnown for oneNano receiverUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons