Product comparison · 2 mice

ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly vs NGS FOG DUAL RED

23specifications compared
5differ
18identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly has 1 more buttons quantity than the NGS FOG DUAL RED (6 vs 5). Device interface: RF Wireless on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, RF Wireless + Bluetooth on the NGS FOG DUAL RED. Frequency band: 2.4 GHz on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, 2.402 - 2.48 GHz on the NGS FOG DUAL RED. Form factor: Right-hand on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, Ambidextrous on the NGS FOG DUAL RED. Product colour: Black on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly, Red on the NGS FOG DUAL RED.

Device interface
- Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:RF Wireless
- FOG DUAL RED:RF Wireless + Bluetooth
Buttons quantity
- Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:6
- FOG DUAL RED:5
Frequency band
- Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:2.4 GHz
- FOG DUAL RED:2.402 - 2.48 GHz
Form factor
- Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Right-hand
- FOG DUAL RED:Ambidextrous
Product colour
- Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Black
- FOG DUAL RED:Red

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AC5102, FOG DUAL RED
40 specifications	A ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly Model AC5102 View product	B NGS FOG DUAL RED View product
Mouse3 differ
Device interfaceDiffers	RF Wireless	RF Wireless + Bluetooth
Buttons quantityDiffers	6	5
Multi-device supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Frequency bandDiffers	2.4 GHz	2.402 - 2.48 GHz
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2
Movement detection technologyKnown for one	Optical	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Form factorDiffers	Right-hand	Ambidextrous
Ergonomic designKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Product colourDiffers	Black	Red
Vertical designKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
USB Type-C charging portKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	82 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	108 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	107 g
Packaging contentidentical
Batteries includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons