Product comparison · 2 mice

Acer GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI vs ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 6identical
  • 18known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI has 2,600 DPI more movement resolution than the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly (4200 DPI vs 1600 DPI). The Acer GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI has 2 more buttons quantity than the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly (8 vs 6). The Acer GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI has 3 more movement resolution modes than the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly (6 vs 3). Purpose: Gaming on the Acer GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI, Universal on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly. Connectivity technology: Wired on the Acer GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI, Wireless on the ACT Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly.

  • Purpose
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:Gaming
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Universal
  • Connectivity technology
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:Wired
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Wireless
  • Movement resolution
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:4200 DPI
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:1600 DPI
  • Buttons quantity
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:8
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:6
  • Number of movement resolution modes
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:6
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:3
  • Product colour
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:Black, Red
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Black
  • Power source
    • GP.MCE11.036 mouse Gaming 4200 DPI:Cable
    • Ergonomic wireless mouse 1600 DPI with vertical grip, eco-friendly:Batteries

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of GP.MCE11.036, AC5102
31 specifications
Mouse5 differ
PurposeDiffersGamingUniversal
Connectivity technologyDiffersWiredWireless
Device interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRF Wireless
Movement detection technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceOptical
Movement resolutionDiffers4200 DPI1600 DPI
Buttons quantityDiffers86
Buttons typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePressed buttons
Silent clickKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of movement resolution modesDiffers63
Frequency bandKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4 GHz
Scrolling directionsKnown for oneVerticalUnknown — not stated by the source
Button functionsKnown for oneDPI switch, Back, ForwardUnknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Form factorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRight-hand
Vertical designKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Product colourDiffersBlack, RedBlack
Surface colorationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMonochromatic
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
IlluminationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Illumination colourKnown for oneRed, Green, BlueUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power sourceDiffersCableBatteries
Number of batteries supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAA
Packaging contentidentical
Receiver includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Wireless receiver interfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-A
Receiver typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNano receiver

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More mouse comparisons

All mouse comparisons