GA.MA GT 510 vs Philips AquaTouch wet and dry electric shaver AT896/17

Comparison of GT 510, AT896/17

22 specifications	A GA.MA GT 510View product	B Philips AquaTouch wet and dry electric shaver AT896/17 Model AT896/17 View product
Features1 differ
Shaver systemKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Rotation shaver
Trimmer	Yes	Yes
Number of shaver heads/bladesKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Product colourDiffers	Black	Black, Blue, Silver
Display typeKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
Pop-up trimmerKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Smooth shaving headsKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Washable	Yes	Yes
Shaving head replacement(s) modelKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	HQ8
Indicationidentical
Battery full indicationKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Battery low indicationKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
Power source	Battery	Battery
Rechargeable	Yes	Yes
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	0.2 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	100-240 V
Power consumption (max)Known for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	5.4 W
Shaving timeKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	45 min
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning brushKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Protection capKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	—Unknown — not stated by the source	Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)
Other featuresidentical
Anti-slip gripKnown for one	Yes	—Unknown — not stated by the source
Connectivity technologyKnown for one	Wireless	—Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.