Product comparison · 2 memory modules

Buffalo TechWorks memory module vs Hypertec 128MB PC800 Kit

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 0identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Hypertec 128MB PC800 Kit has 8.5 more CAS latency than the Buffalo TechWorks memory module (11 vs 2.5). The Hypertec 128MB PC800 Kit has 467 MHz more memory clock speed than the Buffalo TechWorks memory module (800 MHz vs 333 MHz). Internal memory type: DDR on the Buffalo TechWorks memory module, RDRAM on the Hypertec 128MB PC800 Kit. Memory form factor: 200-pin SO-DIMM on the Buffalo TechWorks memory module, 184-pin RIMM on the Hypertec 128MB PC800 Kit.

  • Internal memory type
    • TechWorks memory module:DDR
    • 128MB PC800 Kit:RDRAM
  • Memory form factor
    • TechWorks memory module:200-pin SO-DIMM
    • 128MB PC800 Kit:184-pin RIMM
  • CAS latency
    • TechWorks memory module:2.5
    • 128MB PC800 Kit:11
  • Memory clock speed
    • TechWorks memory module:333 MHz
    • 128MB PC800 Kit:800 MHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of TechWorks, 128MB PC800 Kit
11 specifications
Features4 differ
Internal memoryKnown for one0.5 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Memory layout (modules x size)Known for one1 x 0.5 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memory typeDiffersDDRRDRAM
Memory form factorDiffers200-pin SO-DIMM184-pin RIMM
CAS latencyDiffers2.511
Memory clock speedDiffers333 MHz800 MHz
Memory voltageKnown for one2.5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Component forKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC/Server
ECCKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Memory typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC800
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for oneSO-DIMMUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More memory module comparisons

All memory module comparisons