Product comparison · 2 memory modules

Buffalo 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin vs Kingston Technology 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC

6specifications compared
3differ
3identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

The Buffalo 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin has 0.25 GB more internal memory than the Kingston Technology 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC (0.5 GB vs 0.25 GB). The Buffalo 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin has 2 more CAS latency than the Kingston Technology 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC (5 vs 3). Only the Kingston Technology 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC has ECC.

Internal memory
- 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin:0.5 GB
- 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC:0.25 GB
ECC
- 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin:No
- 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC:Yes
CAS latency
- 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin:5
- 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC:3

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin, 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC
7 specifications	A Buffalo 667MHz, PC2-5300 Unbuffered x64 Non-ECC, 240 Pin View product	B Kingston Technology 256MB, DDR2, PC400, CL3, ECC View product
Features3 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	0.5 GB	0.25 GB
ECCDiffers	No	Yes
CAS latencyDiffers	5	3
Memory clock speedKnown for one	667 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More memory module comparisons

All memory module comparisons