Product comparison · 2 meeting room displays

Jabra Scheduler UC vs Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams

11specifications compared
7differ
4identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

The Jabra Scheduler UC has 46.2 mm more width than the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams (248.2 mm vs 202 mm). The Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams has 100.7 mm more depth than the Jabra Scheduler UC (151 mm vs 50.3 mm). The Jabra Scheduler UC has 69.2 mm more height than the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams (169.2 mm vs 100 mm). Display diagonal: 25.6 cm (10.1") on the Jabra Scheduler UC, 20.3 cm (8") on the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams. Display resolution: 1920 x 1200 pixels on the Jabra Scheduler UC, 1280 x 800 pixels on the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams.

Display diagonal
- Scheduler UC:25.6 cm (10.1")
- CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:20.3 cm (8")
Display resolution
- Scheduler UC:1920 x 1200 pixels
- CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:1280 x 800 pixels
Operating system installed
- Scheduler UC:Android 13.0
- CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:Android
Width
- Scheduler UC:248.2 mm
- CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:202 mm
Depth
- Scheduler UC:50.3 mm
- CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:151 mm
Height
- Scheduler UC:169.2 mm
- CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:100 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Scheduler UC, CTP18 for Microsoft Teams
35 specifications	A Jabra Scheduler UC View product	B Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams View product
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	25.6 cm (10.1")	20.3 cm (8")
Display resolutionDiffers	1920 x 1200 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
TouchscreenKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Touchscreen technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Capacitive
Number of simultaneous touchpointsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10
Designidentical
Housing colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
Proximity sensorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Operating system installedDiffers	Android 13.0	Android
Audioidentical
Built-in microphoneKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)	Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	5.2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN	Yes	Yes
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	256-bit AES, HTTPS, SRTP, TLS
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1x
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE) type supportedKnown for one	Active PoE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power source typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PoE
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 V
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	248.2 mm	202 mm
DepthDiffers	50.3 mm	151 mm
HeightDiffers	169.2 mm	100 mm
WeightKnown for one	670.72 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Mounting kitKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LAN (RJ-45)
Quick start guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mounting bracket(s) includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Certified for Microsoft TeamsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More meeting room display comparisons

All meeting room display comparisons