Product comparison · 2 meeting room displays

Biamp Evoko Liso vs Jabra Scheduler UC

10specifications compared
6differ
4identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Jabra Scheduler UC has 48.2 mm more width than the Biamp Evoko Liso (248.2 mm vs 200 mm). The Jabra Scheduler UC has 25.3 mm more depth than the Biamp Evoko Liso (50.3 mm vs 25 mm). The Biamp Evoko Liso has 30.8 mm more height than the Jabra Scheduler UC (200 mm vs 169.2 mm). Display diagonal: 20.3 cm (8") on the Biamp Evoko Liso, 25.6 cm (10.1") on the Jabra Scheduler UC. Weight: 1.3 kg on the Biamp Evoko Liso, 670.72 g on the Jabra Scheduler UC.

Display diagonal
- Evoko Liso:20.3 cm (8")
- Scheduler UC:25.6 cm (10.1")
Width
- Evoko Liso:200 mm
- Scheduler UC:248.2 mm
Depth
- Evoko Liso:25 mm
- Scheduler UC:50.3 mm
Height
- Evoko Liso:200 mm
- Scheduler UC:169.2 mm
Weight
- Evoko Liso:1.3 kg
- Scheduler UC:670.72 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Evoko Liso, Scheduler UC
35 specifications	A Biamp Evoko Liso View product	B Jabra Scheduler UC View product
Display1 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	20.3 cm (8")	25.6 cm (10.1")
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1200 pixels
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:10
Touchscreen	Yes	Yes
Touchscreen technologyKnown for one	Capacitive	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fingerprint resistantKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Housing colour	Black	Black
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Kensington
Proximity sensorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Operating system installedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Android 13.0
Audioidentical
Built-in microphoneKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Network1 differ
Wi-Fi	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standardsDiffers	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.2
Ethernet LAN	Yes	Yes
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE) type supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Active PoE
Power source typeKnown for one	AC, DC, PoE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Input voltageKnown for one	12 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	200 mm	248.2 mm
DepthDiffers	25 mm	50.3 mm
HeightDiffers	200 mm	169.2 mm
WeightDiffers	1.3 kg	670.72 g
Packaging contentidentical
Mounting kitKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Certified for Microsoft TeamsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
RFID readerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
RFID frequencyKnown for one	13.56 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	300 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	290 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	70 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More meeting room display comparisons

All meeting room display comparisons