ATEN VK320 meeting room display vs Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams

Key differences

The ATEN VK320 meeting room display has 4 W more power consumption (max) than the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams (12 W vs 8 W). The Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams has 77.4 mm more width than the ATEN VK320 meeting room display (202 mm vs 124.6 mm). The ATEN VK320 meeting room display has 49.1 mm more depth than the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams (200.1 mm vs 151 mm). Networking standards: IEEE 802.3af on the ATEN VK320 meeting room display, IEEE 802.1Q, IEEE 802.1p, IEEE 802.1x on the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams. Power source type: DC, PoE on the ATEN VK320 meeting room display, PoE on the Yealink CTP18 for Microsoft Teams.

• Power source type
  • VK320 meeting room display:DC, PoE
  • CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:PoE
• Power consumption (max)
  • VK320 meeting room display:12 W
  • CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:8 W
• Width
  • VK320 meeting room display:124.6 mm
  • CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:202 mm
• Depth
  • VK320 meeting room display:200.1 mm
  • CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:151 mm
• Height
  • VK320 meeting room display:37.7 mm
  • CTP18 for Microsoft Teams:100 mm