Product comparison · 2 massagers

Renpho Power+ Thermacool vs SKG G7 Pro-Fold

7specifications compared
4differ
3identical
35known for one product only

Key differences

The Renpho Power+ Thermacool has 30 min more battery life than the SKG G7 Pro-Fold (240 min vs 210 min). The Renpho Power+ Thermacool has 591.8 g more weight than the SKG G7 Pro-Fold (861.8 g vs 270 g). Massage types: Vibration massage on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, Compression massage, Vibration massage on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold. Proper use: ABS, Back, Legs, Neck on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, Neck on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold.

Proper use
- Power+ Thermacool:ABS, Back, Legs, Neck
- G7 Pro-Fold:Neck
Battery life
- Power+ Thermacool:240 min
- G7 Pro-Fold:210 min
Weight
- Power+ Thermacool:861.8 g
- G7 Pro-Fold:270 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Power+ Thermacool, G7 Pro-Fold
42 specifications	A Renpho Power+ Thermacool View product	B SKG G7 Pro-Fold View product
Features2 differ
Massage typesDiffers	Vibration massage	Compression massage, Vibration massage
Proper useDiffers	ABS, Back, Legs, Neck	Neck
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Blue
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Auto power offKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Adjustable intensityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of power levelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10
Vibrating functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of speedsKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vibration amplitude (max)Known for one	1.2 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of headsKnown for one	6 head(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speedKnown for one	2600 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 W
Battery lifeDiffers	240 min	210 min
Charging timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 h
CordlessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
USB chargingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	861.8 g	270 g
WidthKnown for one	170.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	213.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	60.9 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
PouchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Lithium
Battery capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2400 mAh
Battery weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	42 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	14.8 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	373 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	467 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	495 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	179 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	96 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	221 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	700 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons