Product comparison · 2 massagers

Renpho Power+ Thermacool vs SKG F1 Pro

8specifications compared
5differ
3identical
30known for one product only

Key differences

The Renpho Power+ Thermacool has 60 min more battery life than the SKG F1 Pro (240 min vs 180 min). The Renpho Power+ Thermacool has 400.8 g more weight than the SKG F1 Pro (861.8 g vs 461 g). Massage types: Vibration massage on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, Percussive massage, Vibration massage on the SKG F1 Pro. Proper use: ABS, Back, Legs, Neck on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, Neck, Shoulders on the SKG F1 Pro. Vibration amplitude (max): 1.2 cm on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, 7 mm on the SKG F1 Pro.

Proper use
- Power+ Thermacool:ABS, Back, Legs, Neck
- F1 Pro:Neck, Shoulders
Vibration amplitude (max)
- Power+ Thermacool:1.2 cm
- F1 Pro:7 mm
Battery life
- Power+ Thermacool:240 min
- F1 Pro:180 min
Weight
- Power+ Thermacool:861.8 g
- F1 Pro:461 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Power+ Thermacool, F1 Pro
38 specifications	A Renpho Power+ Thermacool View product	B SKG F1 Pro View product
Features3 differ
Massage typesDiffers	Vibration massage	Percussive massage, Vibration massage
Proper useDiffers	ABS, Back, Legs, Neck	Neck, Shoulders
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Grey
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Vibration amplitude (max)Differs	1.2 cm	7 mm
Adjustable intensityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Heat functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of headsKnown for one	6 head(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speedKnown for one	2600 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 W
Battery lifeDiffers	240 min	180 min
Charging timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 h
CordlessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
USB chargingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	861.8 g	461 g
WidthKnown for one	170.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	213.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	60.9 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Lithium
Battery capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1800 mAh
Battery weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	76.3 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18.4 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	392 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	396 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	472 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	219 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	176 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	652 g
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons