Product comparison · 2 massagers

Renpho Power+ Thermacool vs SKG ES300 - White

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 3identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The Renpho Power+ Thermacool has 120 min more battery life than the SKG ES300 - White (240 min vs 120 min). The Renpho Power+ Thermacool has 551.8 g more weight than the SKG ES300 - White (861.8 g vs 310 g). Massage types: Vibration massage on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, Compression massage on the SKG ES300 - White. Proper use: ABS, Back, Legs, Neck on the Renpho Power+ Thermacool, Eye on the SKG ES300 - White.

  • Massage types
    • Power+ Thermacool:Vibration massage
    • ES300 - White:Compression massage
  • Proper use
    • Power+ Thermacool:ABS, Back, Legs, Neck
    • ES300 - White:Eye
  • Battery life
    • Power+ Thermacool:240 min
    • ES300 - White:120 min
  • Weight
    • Power+ Thermacool:861.8 g
    • ES300 - White:310 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Power+ Thermacool, ES300
39 specifications
Features2 differ
Massage typesDiffersVibration massageCompression massage
Proper useDiffersABS, Back, Legs, NeckEye
Number of programsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWhite
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Adjustable intensityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of speedsKnown for one6Unknown — not stated by the source
Vibration amplitude (max)Known for one1.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of headsKnown for one6 head(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speedKnown for one2600 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 W
Battery lifeDiffers240 min120 min
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3 h
CordlessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
USB chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers861.8 g310 g
WidthKnown for one170.1 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one213.3 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one60.9 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1200 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15.4 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source420 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source310 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source600 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source195 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source140 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source550 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons