Product comparison · 2 massagers

Renpho ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black vs SKG G7 Pro-Fold

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 4identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

Proper use: Legs, Thighs on the Renpho ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black, Neck on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold. Product colour: Black on the Renpho ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black, Blue on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold. Power source type: AC on the Renpho ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black, Battery on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold. Weight: 2.24 kg on the Renpho ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black, 270 g on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold.

  • Proper use
    • ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black:Legs, Thighs
    • G7 Pro-Fold:Neck
  • Product colour
    • ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black:Black
    • G7 Pro-Fold:Blue
  • Power source type
    • ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black:AC
    • G7 Pro-Fold:Battery
  • Weight
    • ALM079H massager Legs, Thighs Black:2.24 kg
    • G7 Pro-Fold:270 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ALM079H, G7 Pro-Fold
43 specifications
Features2 differ
Massage typesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCompression massage, Vibration massage
Proper useDiffersLegs, ThighsNeck
Product colourDiffersBlackBlue
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Control typeButtonsButtons
Auto power offKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Adjustable intensityYesYes
Heat functionYesYes
Number of power levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10
Vibrating functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of programsKnown for one6Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to useKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Integrated timerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Silent operationKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power source typeDiffersACBattery
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBuilt-in
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 W
Battery lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 min
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 h
CordlessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
USB chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2.24 kg270 g
WidthKnown for one170 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one220 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one469.9 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
PouchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2400 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source42 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14.8 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source373 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source467 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source495 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source179 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source96 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source221 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source700 g
Package typeBoxBox
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons