Product comparison · 2 massagers

Renpho Active Thermal Massage Gun vs SKG H7 Ultra-E

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 5identical
  • 35known for one product only

Key differences

The SKG H7 Ultra-E has 90 min more battery life than the Renpho Active Thermal Massage Gun (240 min vs 150 min). Proper use: Universal on the Renpho Active Thermal Massage Gun, Neck, Shoulders on the SKG H7 Ultra-E. Product colour: Black on the Renpho Active Thermal Massage Gun, Gold on the SKG H7 Ultra-E. Weight: 680 g on the Renpho Active Thermal Massage Gun, 1.06 kg on the SKG H7 Ultra-E.

  • Proper use
    • Active Thermal Massage Gun:Universal
    • H7 Ultra-E:Neck, Shoulders
  • Product colour
    • Active Thermal Massage Gun:Black
    • H7 Ultra-E:Gold
  • Battery life
    • Active Thermal Massage Gun:150 min
    • H7 Ultra-E:240 min
  • Weight
    • Active Thermal Massage Gun:680 g
    • H7 Ultra-E:1.06 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Active Thermal Massage Gun, H7 Ultra-E
45 specifications
Features3 differ
Massage typesDiffersBeat massage, Percussive massageCombo massage, Compression massage, Kneading massage, Vibration massage
Proper useDiffersUniversalNeck, Shoulders
Number of programsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3
Product colourDiffersBlackGold
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Adjustable intensityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of speedsKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Vibration amplitude (max)Known for one1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to useKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Integrated timerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of headsKnown for one4 head(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speedKnown for one3200 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Vibrating functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 W
Battery lifeDiffers150 min240 min
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5 h
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
USB chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers680 g1.06 kg
WidthKnown for one58 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one147 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one185 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Power adapter includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2200 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source95 g
Rechargeable batteryKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14.2 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source544 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source356 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source524 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source166 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source149 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source276 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.28 kg
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons