Product comparison · 2 massagers

Philips Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00 vs SKG G7 Pro-Fold

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The SKG G7 Pro-Fold has 5 more power levels than the Philips Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00 (10 vs 5). The Philips Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00 has 0.5 h more charging time than the SKG G7 Pro-Fold (4 h vs 3.5 h). Proper use: Universal on the Philips Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00, Neck on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold. Battery type: NiMH on the Philips Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00, Built-in on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold. Input voltage: 100 -240 V on the Philips Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00, 5 V on the SKG G7 Pro-Fold.

  • Proper use
    • Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00:Universal
    • G7 Pro-Fold:Neck
  • Number of power levels
    • Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00:5
    • G7 Pro-Fold:10
  • Battery type
    • Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00:NiMH
    • G7 Pro-Fold:Built-in
  • Charging time
    • Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00:4 h
    • G7 Pro-Fold:3.5 h
  • Input voltage
    • Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00:100 -240 V
    • G7 Pro-Fold:5 V
  • Quantity per pack
    • Dual Sensual Massagers HF8440/00:3 pc(s)
    • G7 Pro-Fold:1 pc(s)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of HF8440/00, G7 Pro-Fold
38 specifications
Features2 differ
Massage typesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCompression massage, Vibration massage
Proper useDiffersUniversalNeck
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlue
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Auto power offKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Adjustable intensityYesYes
Heat functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of power levelsDiffers510
Vibrating functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of programsKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
Power source typeBatteryBattery
Battery typeDiffersNiMHBuilt-in
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 W
Battery lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source210 min
Charging timeDiffers4 h3.5 h
CordlessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input voltageDiffers100 -240 V5 V
USB chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source270 g
Packaging content1 differ
Quantity per packDiffers3 pc(s)1 pc(s)
PouchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Batteries includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2400 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source42 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14.8 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source373 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source467 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source495 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source179 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source96 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source221 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source700 g
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons