Product comparison · 2 massagers

HoMedics NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise vs SKG W7 PRO

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 4identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The SKG W7 PRO has 7 more power levels than the HoMedics NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise (9 vs 2). Proper use: Neck on the HoMedics NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise, Waist on the SKG W7 PRO. Product colour: Black, Grey, Turquoise on the HoMedics NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise, Gold on the SKG W7 PRO. Battery type: AA on the HoMedics NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise, Built-in on the SKG W7 PRO.

  • Proper use
    • NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise:Neck
    • W7 PRO:Waist
  • Product colour
    • NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise:Black, Grey, Turquoise
    • W7 PRO:Gold
  • Number of power levels
    • NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise:2
    • W7 PRO:9
  • Battery type
    • NMSQ-215A-EU massager Neck Black, Grey, Turquoise:AA
    • W7 PRO:Built-in

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of NMSQ-215A-EU, W7 PRO
40 specifications
Features3 differ
Massage typesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCombo massage
Proper useDiffersNeckWaist
Product colourDiffersBlack, Grey, TurquoiseGold
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic, Polyurethane (PU)
Adjustable intensityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Heat functionYesYes
Number of heads2 head(s)2 head(s)
Number of power levelsDiffers29
Number of programsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s) featuresKnown for oneErgonomic, Non-slip grip, Soft touchUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to useKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Vibrating functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCEUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power source typeBatteryBattery
Battery typeDiffersAABuilt-in
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 W
Battery lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90 min
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 h
CordlessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
USB chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source219 g
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
Batteries includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2000 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33.2 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source17.3 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source306 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source392 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source572 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source28 pc(s)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source286 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source44 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source153 mm
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons