Product comparison · 2 massagers

HoMedics FM-TS9 massager Foot White vs SKG E3 Pro

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 2identical
  • 29known for one product only

Key differences

The HoMedics FM-TS9 massager Foot White has 23 W more power than the SKG E3 Pro (28 W vs 5 W). The SKG E3 Pro has 10 mm more package width than the HoMedics FM-TS9 massager Foot White (440 mm vs 430 mm). The SKG E3 Pro has 298 mm more package depth than the HoMedics FM-TS9 massager Foot White (518 mm vs 220 mm). Massage types: Shiatsu massage on the HoMedics FM-TS9 massager Foot White, Compression massage on the SKG E3 Pro. Proper use: Foot on the HoMedics FM-TS9 massager Foot White, Eye on the SKG E3 Pro.

  • Massage types
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:Shiatsu massage
    • E3 Pro:Compression massage
  • Proper use
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:Foot
    • E3 Pro:Eye
  • Product colour
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:White
    • E3 Pro:Blue
  • Power source type
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:AC
    • E3 Pro:Battery
  • Power
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:28 W
    • E3 Pro:5 W
  • Weight
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:2.7 kg
    • E3 Pro:278 g
  • Package width
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:430 mm
    • E3 Pro:440 mm
  • Package depth
    • FM-TS9 massager Foot White:220 mm
    • E3 Pro:518 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of FM-TS9, E3 Pro
40 specifications
Features3 differ
Massage typesDiffersShiatsu massageCompression massage
Proper useDiffersFootEye
Product colourDiffersWhiteBlue
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Adjustable intensityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Heat functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of power levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Control typeKnown for oneTouchUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to useKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of headsKnown for one18 head(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power source typeDiffersACBattery
Battery typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBuilt-in
PowerDiffers28 W5 W
Battery lifeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 min
Charging timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 h
CordlessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 V
USB chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers2.7 kg278 g
WidthKnown for one375 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one105 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one345 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1500 mAh
Battery weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source27.9 g
Logistics dataidentical
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15.2 kg
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source287 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source518 mm
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source440 mm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 pc(s)
Commodity codeKnown for one90191010Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers430 mm440 mm
Package depthDiffers220 mm518 mm
Package heightDiffers510 mm287 mm
Package typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBox
Package weightKnown for one2.15 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More massager comparisons

All massager comparisons