Product comparison · 2 loudspeakers

JBL Jembe 2.0 vs Philips SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0

11specifications compared
6differ
5identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

Frequency range
- Jembe 2.0:80 - 20000 Hz
- SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0:100 - 18000 Hz
Recommended usage
- Jembe 2.0:Universal
- SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0:PC / Laptop
Package width
- Jembe 2.0:320 mm
- SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0:198 mm
Package depth
- Jembe 2.0:150 mm
- SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0:98 mm
Package height
- Jembe 2.0:170 mm
- SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0:150 mm
Package weight
- Jembe 2.0:1.46 kg
- SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0:564 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Jembe 2.0, SPA3250/97
45 specifications	A JBL Jembe 2.0 View product	B Philips SPA3250 Multimedia Speaker 2.0 Model SPA3250/97 View product
Loudspeakersidentical
Audio output channels	2.0 channels	2.0 channels
Number of drivers	2	2
Speaker placementKnown for one	Tabletop/bookshelf	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio1 differ
Frequency rangeDiffers	80 - 20000 Hz	100 - 18000 Hz
RMS rated powerKnown for one	12 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
ImpedanceKnown for one	5 Ω	Unknown — not stated by the source
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)Known for one	80 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)Known for one	1%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Product colour	Black	Black
Recommended usageDiffers	Universal	PC / Laptop
Number of speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Power
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationKnown for one	FCC, CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
BluetoothKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
3.5 mm connector	Yes	Yes
USB connectivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Headphone connectivityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.5 mm
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	20 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one	1.5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC input voltageKnown for one	12 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Cord lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 m
WidthKnown for one	106 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	135 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	106 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	320 mm	198 mm
Package depthDiffers	150 mm	98 mm
Package heightDiffers	170 mm	150 mm
Package weightDiffers	1.46 kg	564 g
Other featuresidentical
InterfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB/3.5 mm
Product typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stereo portable speaker
QuantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Gross weight of outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.594 kg
Height (cm) outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	37.2 cm
Length (cm) outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	63.2 cm
Net weight of outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10.728 kg
Packaging net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.447 kg
Packaging tare weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.117 kg
Tare weight outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.866 kg
Width (cm) outer cartonKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	42.9 cm
EqualizerKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Amplifieridentical
AmplifierKnown for one	Built-in	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More loudspeaker comparisons

All loudspeaker comparisons