Product comparison · 2 loudspeakers

Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 vs Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired

23specifications compared
14differ
9identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 has 1 -way more speaker type than the Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired (3-way vs 2-way). The Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 has 1 more drivers than the Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired (3 vs 2). The Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 has 1.06 cm more tweeter diameter than the Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired (3.56 cm vs 2.5 cm). Speaker placement: Flyable on the Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64, Wall-mountable on the Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired. Tweeter diameter (imperial): 3.56 cm (1.4") on the Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64, 2.54 cm (1") on the Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired.

Speaker type
- Community IP8-1153WR64:3-way
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:2-way
Speaker placement
- Community IP8-1153WR64:Flyable
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:Wall-mountable
Number of drivers
- Community IP8-1153WR64:3
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:2
Tweeter diameter
- Community IP8-1153WR64:3.56 cm
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:2.5 cm
Tweeter diameter (imperial)
- Community IP8-1153WR64:3.56 cm (1.4")
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:2.54 cm (1")
RMS rated power
- Community IP8-1153WR64:600 W
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:200 W
Frequency range
- Community IP8-1153WR64:30 - 18500 Hz
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:60 - 18000 Hz
Sensitivity
- Community IP8-1153WR64:96 dB
- Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired:98 dB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Community IP8-1153WR64, V2-1596W
37 specifications	A Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 View product	B Biamp Community V2-1596W 2-way White Wired Model V2-1596W View product
Loudspeakers5 differ
Speaker typeDiffers	3-way	2-way
Speaker placementDiffers	Flyable	Wall-mountable
Number of driversDiffers	3	2
Tweeter	Yes	Yes
Number of tweeter drivers	1	1
Tweeter diameterDiffers	3.56 cm	2.5 cm
Tweeter diameter (imperial)Differs	3.56 cm (1.4")	2.54 cm (1")
Woofer	Yes	Yes
Number of woofer drivers	1	1
Woofer diameter	38.1 cm	38.1 cm
Woofer diameter (imperial)	38.1 cm (15")	38.1 cm (15")
Speaker grille materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Steel
Audio4 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	600 W	200 W
Frequency rangeDiffers	30 - 18500 Hz	60 - 18000 Hz
Impedance	8 Ω	8 Ω
SensitivityDiffers	96 dB	98 dB
Sound pressure level (max)Differs	137 dB	121 dB
Peak Music Power Output (PMPO)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 W
Speakers RMS powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	200 W
BeamwidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 - 60°
Performance1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey	White
Market segmentKnown for one	Professional	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recommended usageKnown for one	Stage	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of speakers	1	1
Housing materialKnown for one	Polymer	Unknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	IP55	Unknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for outdoor useKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for indoor useKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Amplifieridentical
AmplifierKnown for one	External	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technology	Wired	Wired
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	561 mm	467 mm
DepthDiffers	668 mm	404 mm
HeightDiffers	991 mm	690 mm
WeightDiffers	47.6 kg	21.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Mounting brackets includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More loudspeaker comparisons

All loudspeaker comparisons