Product comparison · 2 loudspeakers

Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 vs Biamp Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 20differ
  • 6identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 has 1 -way more speaker type than the Biamp Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired (3-way vs 2-way). The Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 has 1.06 cm more tweeter diameter than the Biamp Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired (3.56 cm vs 2.5 cm). The Biamp Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired has 1 more woofer drivers than the Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 (2 vs 1). Only the Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64 has suitable for outdoor use. Speaker placement: Flyable on the Biamp Community IP8-1153WR64, Wall-mountable on the Biamp Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired.

  • Speaker type
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:3-way
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:2-way
  • Speaker placement
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:Flyable
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:Wall-mountable
  • Tweeter diameter
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:3.56 cm
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:2.5 cm
  • Tweeter diameter (imperial)
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:3.56 cm (1.4")
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:2.54 cm (1")
  • Number of woofer drivers
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:1
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:2
  • Woofer diameter
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:38.1 cm
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:20.3 cm
  • Woofer diameter (imperial)
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:38.1 cm (15")
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:20.3 cm (8")
  • RMS rated power
    • Community IP8-1153WR64:600 W
    • Community IC6-2082T96W 2-way White Wired:200 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Community IP8-1153WR64, IC6-2082T96W
39 specifications
Loudspeakers7 differ
Speaker typeDiffers3-way2-way
Audio output channelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0 channels
Speaker placementDiffersFlyableWall-mountable
Speaker enclosureKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceClosed
Number of drivers33
Driver diameterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20.3 cm
Driver diaphragm materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolymer fibre
TweeterYesYes
Number of tweeter drivers11
Tweeter diameterDiffers3.56 cm2.5 cm
Tweeter diameter (imperial)Differs3.56 cm (1.4")2.54 cm (1")
WooferYesYes
Number of woofer driversDiffers12
Woofer diameterDiffers38.1 cm20.3 cm
Woofer diameter (imperial)Differs38.1 cm (15")20.3 cm (8")
Audio5 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers600 W200 W
Frequency rangeDiffers30 - 18500 Hz50 - 19500 Hz
ImpedanceDiffers8 Ω16 Ω
SensitivityDiffers96 dB100 dB
Sound pressure level (max)Differs137 dB125 dB
BeamwidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90 - 60°
Performance4 differ
Product colourDiffersGreyWhite
Market segmentDiffersProfessionalConsumer
Number of speakers11
Housing materialDiffersPolymerPlywood
Suitable for indoor useKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Suggested genderKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBoy/Girl
Recommended age groupKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAdult
Suitable for outdoor useDiffersYesNo
Recommended usageKnown for oneStageUnknown — not stated by the source
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for oneIP55Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Connectivity technologyWiredWired
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers561 mm571 mm
DepthDiffers668 mm270 mm
HeightDiffers991 mm287 mm
WeightDiffers47.6 kg15.9 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Mounting brackets includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Amplifieridentical
AmplifierKnown for oneExternalUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More loudspeaker comparisons

All loudspeaker comparisons