Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM vs Canon Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC has 20.25° more lens viewing angle, diagonal than the Canon Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM (28.5° vs 8.25°). The Canon Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC has 0.4 mm more thread diameter than the Canon Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM (7.5 mm vs 7.1 mm). The Canon Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC has 5 g more weight than the Canon Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM (425 g vs 420 g). Focal length range: 90 - 300 mm on the Canon Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM, 85 mm on the Canon Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC.

  • Lens viewing angle, diagonal
    • Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM:8.25°
    • Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC:28.5°
  • Focal length range
    • Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM:90 - 300 mm
    • Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC:85 mm
  • Thread diameter
    • Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM:7.1 mm
    • Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC:7.5 mm
  • Weight
    • Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM:420 g
    • Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC:425 g
  • Magnification
    • Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM:0.25x
    • Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC:0.13x

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Zoom Lens EF 90-300mm f 4.5-5.6 USM, Zoom lens EF85 1:1.8 ULTRASONIC
8 specifications
Lens system3 differ
Lens structure (elements/groups)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7/9
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers8.25°28.5°
Focal length rangeDiffers90 - 300 mm85 mm
Thread diameterDiffers7.1 mm7.5 mm
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Filter size58 mm58 mm
WeightDiffers420 g425 g
Other features1 differ
MagnificationDiffers0.25x0.13x

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons