Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye vs Dahua Technology PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 1identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye has 167.4° more lens viewing angle, horizontal than the Dahua Technology PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black (190° vs 22.6°). The Canon RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye has 178° more lens viewing angle, vertical than the Dahua Technology PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black (190° vs 12°). The Canon RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye has 164.4° more lens viewing angle, diagonal than the Dahua Technology PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black (190° vs 25.6°). Component for: SLR on the Canon RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye, IP Camera on the Dahua Technology PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black. Lens type: Wide fish-eye lens on the Canon RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye, Fixed focus lens on the Dahua Technology PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black.

  • Component for
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:SLR
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:IP Camera
  • Lens type
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:Wide fish-eye lens
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:Fixed focus lens
  • Lens viewing angle, horizontal
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:190°
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:22.6°
  • Lens viewing angle, vertical
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:190°
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:12°
  • Lens viewing angle, diagonal
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:190°
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:25.6°
  • Closest focusing distance
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:0.2 m
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:2 m
  • Lens mount interface
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:Canon RF
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:C mount
  • Maximum aperture number
    • RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye:16
    • PFL35-K10M IP Camera Fixed focus lens Black:1.4

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of RF 5.2 mm f2.8L Dual Fisheye, PFL35-K10M
27 specifications
Lens system9 differ
Component forDiffersSLRIP Camera
Lens structure (elements/groups)Known for one10/12Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens typeDiffersWide fish-eye lensFixed focus lens
Lens viewing angle, horizontalDiffers190°22.6°
Lens viewing angle, verticalDiffers190°12°
Fixed focal lengthKnown for one5.2 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers190°25.6°
Closest focusing distanceDiffers0.2 m2 m
Image sensor formatKnown for oneFull frameUnknown — not stated by the source
Lens mount interfaceDiffersCanon RFC mount
Maximum aperture numberDiffers161.4
Minimum aperture numberDiffers2.81.4
Aperture range (F-F)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4 - 1.4
Focal length rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source35 mm
Performanceidentical
Camera brands compatibilityKnown for oneCanonUnknown — not stated by the source
Lens coating featuresKnown for oneSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum magnificationKnown for one0.03xUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-30 - 70 °C
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
DustproofKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
WeatherproofKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
LengthDiffers53.5 mm48.9 mm
WeightDiffers350 g163 g
Packaging contentidentical
Bag includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Lens mount cap includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Lens cap includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Total megapixelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 MP

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons