All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon RF 35 mm f1.4L VCM vs Canon RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 8identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z has 0.17 m more closest focusing distance than the Canon RF 35 mm f1.4L VCM (0.45 m vs 0.28 m). The Canon RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z has 1.4 more maximum aperture number than the Canon RF 35 mm f1.4L VCM (2.8 vs 1.4). The Canon RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z has 6 more minimum aperture number than the Canon RF 35 mm f1.4L VCM (22 vs 16). Lens structure (elements/groups): 14/11 on the Canon RF 35 mm f1.4L VCM, 23/18 on the Canon RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z. Lens type: Wide-angle on the Canon RF 35 mm f1.4L VCM, Zoom lens on the Canon RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM Z.

  • Lens structure (elements/groups)
    • 14/11
    • 23/18
  • Lens type
    • Wide-angle
    • Zoom lens
  • Lens viewing angle, horizontal
    • 54°
    • 74° - 19° 20'
  • Lens viewing angle, vertical
    • 38°
    • 53° - 13°
  • Lens viewing angle, diagonal
    • 63°
    • 84° - 23°20'
  • Closest focusing distance
    • 0.28 m
    • 0.45 m
  • Maximum aperture number
    • 1.4
    • 2.8
  • Minimum aperture number
    • 16
    • 22

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
55 specifications
A

Canon

RF 35 mm f1.4L VCMView product
B

Canon

RF24-105mm F2.8 L IS USM ZView product
Lens system10 differ
Lens structure (elements/groups)Differs14/1123/18
Lens typeDiffersWide-angleZoom lens
Lens viewing angle, horizontalDiffers54°74° - 19° 20'
Focus adjustmentKnown for oneAuto/Manual
Lens viewing angle, verticalDiffers38°53° - 13°
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers63°84° - 23°20'
Focal length rangeKnown for one24 - 105 mm
Closest focusing distanceDiffers0.28 m0.45 m
Image sensor formatKnown for oneFull frame
Macro ratioKnown for one1:3.4
Maximum aperture numberDiffers1.42.8
Minimum aperture numberDiffers1622
Number of aspheric elementsKnown for one3
Teleconverter/Extender compatibleKnown for oneNo
Image stabilizer typeDiffersIn-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS), Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)
Image stabilizer number of stopsDiffers75.5
Image stabilizer number of stops (OIS)Known for one5.5
Image stabilizer number of stops (IBIS x OIS)Known for one8
Performance3 differ
AF actuatorDiffersNano USM, VCMUSM
Auto focusKnown for oneYes
Circular apertureKnown for oneYes
Lens coating featuresDiffersAir Sphere Coating (ASC), Super Spectra Coating (SSC)Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Lens colourKnown for oneBlack
Manual focusKnown for oneYes
Number of Ultra-low Dispersion (UD) elementsKnown for one4
Lens hood modelDiffersEW-73FEW-88E
Maximum magnificationKnown for one0.18x
Designidentical
Mounting typeKnown for oneBayonet
DustproofKnown for oneYes
WeatherproofKnown for oneYes
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneJapan
Layers per palletKnown for one3 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one24 pc(s)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DiameterDiffers7.65 cm8.85 cm
Filter sizeDiffers67 mm82 mm
LengthDiffers99.3 mm199 mm
WeightDiffers555 g1.33 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one184 mm
Package heightKnown for one312 mm
Package weightKnown for one2.11 kg
Package widthKnown for one184 mm
Package typeKnown for oneBox
Packaging contentidentical
Lens cap includedKnown for oneYes
Lens cap modelKnown for oneE-82 II
Rear lens cap includedKnown for oneYes
Rear lens cap modelKnown for oneRF
User guideKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons