Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM vs Canon RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 6identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM has 2 /7 more lens structure (elements/groups) than the Canon RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM (9/7 vs 7/7). The Canon RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM has 1.7 more maximum aperture number than the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM (4.5 vs 2.8). The Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM has 15.7 more minimum aperture number than the Canon RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM (22 vs 6.3). Lens type: Ultra-wide lens on the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM, Standard zoom lens on the Canon RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM. Lens viewing angle, horizontal: 98° on the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM, 64° 30'- 28° 20' on the Canon RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM.

  • Lens structure (elements/groups)
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:9/7
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:7/7
  • Lens type
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:Ultra-wide lens
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:Standard zoom lens
  • Lens viewing angle, horizontal
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:98°
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:64° 30'- 28° 20'
  • Lens viewing angle, vertical
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:74°
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:45° 30' - 19° 05'
  • Lens viewing angle, diagonal
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:108°
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:74° 20'- 33° 40'
  • Maximum aperture number
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:2.8
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:4.5
  • Minimum aperture number
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:22
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:6.3
  • Diameter
    • RF 16mm F2.8 STM:6.92 cm
    • RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM:6.9 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of RF 16mm F2.8 STM, RF-S 18-45 mm f4.5-6.3 IS STM
37 specifications
Lens system7 differ
Component forMILCMILC
Lens structure (elements/groups)Differs9/77/7
Lens typeDiffersUltra-wide lensStandard zoom lens
Lens viewing angle, horizontalDiffers98°64° 30'- 28° 20'
Lens viewing angle, verticalDiffers74°45° 30' - 19° 05'
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers108°74° 20'- 33° 40'
Focal length rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 - 45 mm
Image sensor formatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAPS-C
Lens mount interfaceCanon RFCanon RF
Maximum aperture numberDiffers2.84.5
Maximum focal length (35mm film equiv)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source72 mm
Minimum aperture numberDiffers226.3
Minimum focal length (35mm film equiv)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source29 mm
Zoom capabilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Image stabilizerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Fixed focal lengthKnown for one16 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Closest focusing distanceKnown for one0.13 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of diaphragm bladesKnown for one7Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Auto focusYesYes
Camera brands compatibilityCanonCanon
Lens coating featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
AF actuatorKnown for oneSTMUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum magnificationKnown for one0.26xUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceJapan
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DiameterDiffers6.92 cm6.9 cm
Filter sizeDiffers43 mm49 mm
LengthDiffers40.1 mm44.3 mm
WeightDiffers165 g130 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package depthDiffers94 mm150 mm
Package heightDiffers117 mm100 mm
Package weightDiffers281 g200 g
Package widthDiffers94 mm150 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Lens cap includedYesYes
Lens cap modelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceE-49
Rear lens cap includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons