Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM vs Samsung D-Xenon 50-200

6specifications compared
5differ
1identical
10known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM has 0.45 cm more diameter than the Samsung D-Xenon 50-200 (7.1 cm vs 6.65 cm). The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM has 6 mm more filter size than the Samsung D-Xenon 50-200 (58 mm vs 52 mm). The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM has 43.5 mm more length than the Samsung D-Xenon 50-200 (122 mm vs 78.5 mm). Lens viewing angle, diagonal: 32.17 - 8.25° on the Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM, 31.5° on the Samsung D-Xenon 50-200.

Lens viewing angle, diagonal
- EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM:32.17 - 8.25°
- D-Xenon 50-200:31.5°
Diameter
- EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM:7.1 cm
- D-Xenon 50-200:6.65 cm
Filter size
- EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM:58 mm
- D-Xenon 50-200:52 mm
Length
- EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM:122 mm
- D-Xenon 50-200:78.5 mm
Weight
- EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM:480 g
- D-Xenon 50-200:254 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM, D-Xenon 50-200
16 specifications	A Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM View product	B Samsung D-Xenon 50-200 View product
Lens system1 differ
Component forKnown for one	SLR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens structure (elements/groups)Known for one	13/9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens typeKnown for one	Telephoto lens	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers	32.17 - 8.25°	31.5°
Focal length rangeKnown for one	75 - 300 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Closest focusing distanceKnown for one	1.5 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens mount interfaceKnown for one	Canon EF	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of diaphragm bladesKnown for one	7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum aperture numberKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32
Performanceidentical
AF actuatorKnown for one	Micro USM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DiameterDiffers	7.1 cm	6.65 cm
Filter sizeDiffers	58 mm	52 mm
LengthDiffers	122 mm	78.5 mm
WeightDiffers	480 g	254 g
Other featuresidentical
MagnificationKnown for one	0.25x	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons