Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM vs Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens

10specifications compared
9differ
1identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM has 1.12 m more closest focusing distance than the Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens (1.4 m vs 0.28 m). The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM has 10 more maximum aperture number than the Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens (32 vs 22). The Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM has 1 more diaphragm blades than the Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens (8 vs 7). Lens structure (elements/groups): 23/18 on the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, 14/10 on the Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens. Focal length range: 70 - 200 mm on the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, 16 - 35 mm on the Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens.

Lens structure (elements/groups)
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:23/18
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:14/10
Focal length range
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:70 - 200 mm
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:16 - 35 mm
Closest focusing distance
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:1.4 m
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:0.28 m
Maximum aperture number
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:32
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:22
Number of diaphragm blades
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:8
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:7
Diameter
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:8.62 cm
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:8.35 cm
Length
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:197 mm
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:103 mm
Weight
- EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:1.57 kg
- EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens:600 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens
15 specifications	A Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM View product	B Canon EF16-35mm f/2.8 L USM Zoom Lens View product
Lens system5 differ
Lens structure (elements/groups)Differs	23/18	14/10
Focal length rangeDiffers	70 - 200 mm	16 - 35 mm
Closest focusing distanceDiffers	1.4 m	0.28 m
Maximum aperture numberDiffers	32	22
Number of diaphragm bladesDiffers	8	7
Image stabilizerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
AF actuatorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USM
Auto focusKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Manual focusKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DiameterDiffers	8.62 cm	8.35 cm
Filter size	77 mm	77 mm
LengthDiffers	197 mm	103 mm
WeightDiffers	1.57 kg	600 g
Other features1 differ
MagnificationDiffers	0.17x	0.22x

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons