Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon EF 200mm F/2L IS USM vs Canon Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON

7specifications compared
7differ
0identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon EF 200mm F/2L IS USM has 0.9 m more closest focusing distance than the Canon Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON (1.9 m vs 1 m). The Canon Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON has 1 more diaphragm blades than the Canon EF 200mm F/2L IS USM (9 vs 8). The Canon EF 200mm F/2L IS USM has 4.14 cm more diameter than the Canon Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON (12.8 cm vs 8.66 cm). Magnification: 0.12x on the Canon EF 200mm F/2L IS USM, 1:3.5 on the Canon Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON.

Closest focusing distance
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:1.9 m
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:1 m
Number of diaphragm blades
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:8
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:9
Diameter
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:12.8 cm
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:8.66 cm
Filter size
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:52 mm
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:77 mm
Length
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:208 mm
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:184.4 mm
Weight
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:2.52 kg
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:1.37 kg
Magnification
- EF 200mm F/2L IS USM:0.12x
- Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON:1:3.5

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EF 200mm F/2L IS USM, Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON
13 specifications	A Canon EF 200mm F/2L IS USM View product	B Canon Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM CANON View product
Lens system2 differ
Lens structure (elements/groups)Known for one	17/12	Unknown — not stated by the source
Focal length rangeKnown for one	200 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Closest focusing distanceDiffers	1.9 m	1 m
Maximum aperture numberKnown for one	32	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of diaphragm bladesDiffers	8	9
Lens viewing angle, diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34.3°
Minimum aperture numberKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DiameterDiffers	12.8 cm	8.66 cm
Filter sizeDiffers	52 mm	77 mm
LengthDiffers	208 mm	184.4 mm
WeightDiffers	2.52 kg	1.37 kg
Other features1 differ
MagnificationDiffers	0.12x	1:3.5
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons