Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM vs Canon EF28-200mm 1:3.5-5.6

4specifications compared
3differ
1identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

Lens structure (elements/groups)
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM:14/10
- EF28-200mm 1:3.5-5.6:16/12
Filter size
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM:77 mm
- EF28-200mm 1:3.5-5.6:72 mm
Weight
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM:600 g
- EF28-200mm 1:3.5-5.6:495 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM, EF28-200mm 1:3.5-5.6
15 specifications	A Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM View product	B Canon EF28-200mm 1:3.5-5.6 View product
Lens system1 differ
Component forKnown for one	SLR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens structure (elements/groups)Differs	14/10	16/12
Lens typeKnown for one	Ultra-wide lens	Unknown — not stated by the source
Focal length rangeKnown for one	16 - 35 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Closest focusing distanceKnown for one	0.28 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aperture range (F-F)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 - 36
Lens viewing angle, diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75°
Thread diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.84 cm
Minimum aperture numberKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DiameterKnown for one	8.35 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filter sizeDiffers	77 mm	72 mm
LengthKnown for one	103 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	600 g	495 g
Other featuresidentical
MagnificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.28x

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons