Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM vs Samsung D-Xenon 50-200

Key differences

Lens viewing angle, diagonal
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:108.1 - 63°
- D-Xenon 50-200:31.5°
Maximum aperture number
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:22
- D-Xenon 50-200:32
Diameter
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:8.85 cm
- D-Xenon 50-200:6.65 cm
Filter size
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:82 mm
- D-Xenon 50-200:52 mm
Length
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:111.6 mm
- D-Xenon 50-200:78.5 mm
Weight
- EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:640 g
- D-Xenon 50-200:254 g

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM, D-Xenon 50-200
17 specifications	A Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM View product	B Samsung D-Xenon 50-200 View product
Lens system2 differ
Component forKnown for one	SLR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens structure (elements/groups)Known for one	16/12	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens typeKnown for one	Ultra-wide lens	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens viewing angle, diagonalDiffers	108.1 - 63°	31.5°
Focal length rangeKnown for one	16 - 35 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Closest focusing distanceKnown for one	0.28 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lens mount interfaceKnown for one	Canon EF	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum aperture numberDiffers	22	32
Number of diaphragm bladesKnown for one	7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Image stabilizerKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
AF actuatorKnown for one	Ring USM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DiameterDiffers	8.85 cm	6.65 cm
Filter sizeDiffers	82 mm	52 mm
LengthDiffers	111.6 mm	78.5 mm
WeightDiffers	640 g	254 g
Other featuresidentical
MagnificationKnown for one	0.22x	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.