Product comparison · 2 lenses

Canon CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M) vs Canon CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M)

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 7identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The Canon CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M) has 0.4 m more closest focusing distance than the Canon CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M) (1 m vs 0.6 m). The Canon CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M) has 93.7 mm more length than the Canon CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M) (233.3 mm vs 139.6 mm). The Canon CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M) has 1.9 kg more weight than the Canon CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M) (3.4 kg vs 1.5 kg). Lens mount interface: PL mount on the Canon CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M), Canon RF on the Canon CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M).

  • Closest focusing distance
    • CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M):0.6 m
    • CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M):1 m
  • Lens mount interface
    • CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M):PL mount
    • CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M):Canon RF
  • Length
    • CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M):233.3 mm
    • CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M):139.6 mm
  • Weight
    • CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M):3.4 kg
    • CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M):1.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CN-E14-35mm T1.7 L SP (M), CN-R135MM T2.2 L F (M)
16 specifications
Lens system2 differ
Fixed focal lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source135 mm
Closest focusing distanceDiffers0.6 m1 m
Lens mount interfaceDiffersPL mountCanon RF
Focal length rangeKnown for one14 - 35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Zoom capabilityKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DiameterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11.8 cm
LengthDiffers233.3 mm139.6 mm
WeightDiffers3.4 kg1.5 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.19 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More lens comparisons

All lens comparisons