Product comparison · 2 laser printers

Ricoh SP 4210N vs Ricoh SP4210N 600 x 1200 DPI A4

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 17identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

  • Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)
    • SP 4210N:36 ppm
    • SP4210N 600 x 1200 DPI A4:37 ppm
  • Weight
    • SP 4210N:15.5 kg
    • SP4210N 600 x 1200 DPI A4:17.5 kg
  • Power requirements
    • SP 4210N:220 - 240 V, 50 / 60 Hz
    • SP4210N 600 x 1200 DPI A4:220 - 240 V, 50/60 Hz
  • Power consumption (active)
    • SP 4210N:990 W
    • SP4210N 600 x 1200 DPI A4:582 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SP 4210N, SP4210N
29 specifications
Printing1 differ
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Differs36 ppm37 ppm
Paper handlingidentical
Paper tray media typesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEnvelopes, Plain paper, Recycled paper, Transparencies
Networkidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWPA
Designidentical
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFCC UL
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers15.5 kg17.5 kg
Other features2 differ
Power requirementsDiffers220 - 240 V, 50 / 60 Hz220 - 240 V, 50/60 Hz
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIEEE 802.1x
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 2000/XP/2003 UNIX Sun Solaris 2.6/7/8/9/10 Mac 8.6 - 9.2.X +
Networking featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFast Ethernet
Power consumption (active)Differs990 W582 W
CompatibilityKnown for oneWin 2000,XP,Server 2003 UNIX Sun Solaris 2.6,7,8,9,10 Mac 8.6 - 9.2.X+Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (standby)Known for one10 WUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laser printer comparisons

All laser printer comparisons