Product comparison · 2 laser printers

Ricoh SP 3300D vs Samsung CLP-315W laser printer Colour

19specifications compared
16differ
3identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Colour
- SP 3300D:No
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:Yes
Duplex printing
- SP 3300D:Yes
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:No
Maximum resolution
- SP 3300D:1200 x 1200 DPI
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:2400 x 600 DPI
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)
- SP 3300D:30 ppm
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:16 ppm
Time to first page (black, normal)
- SP 3300D:8.5 s
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:14 s
Maximum duty cycle
- SP 3300D:50000 pages per month
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:20000 pages per month
Total input capacity
- SP 3300D:251 sheets
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:150 sheets
Total output capacity
- SP 3300D:150 sheets
- CLP-315W laser printer Colour:100 sheets

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of SP 3300D, CLP-315W
40 specifications	A Ricoh SP 3300D View product	B Samsung CLP-315W laser printer Colour Model CLP-315W View product
Printing5 differ
ColourDiffers	No	Yes
Duplex printingDiffers	Yes	No
Maximum resolutionDiffers	1200 x 1200 DPI	2400 x 600 DPI
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Differs	30 ppm	16 ppm
Warm-up timeKnown for one	22 s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Time to first page (black, normal)Differs	8.5 s	14 s
Print speed (colour, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 ppm
Time to first page (colour, normal)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	26 s
Features1 differ
Maximum duty cycleDiffers	50000 pages per month	20000 pages per month
Input & output capacity2 differ
Total input capacityDiffers	251 sheets	150 sheets
Total output capacityDiffers	150 sheets	100 sheets
Maximum input capacityKnown for one	501 sheets	Unknown — not stated by the source
Paper handling2 differ
Paper tray media typesDiffers	Envelopes	Envelopes, Glossy paper, Labels, Recycled paper, Transparencies
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Differs	A4, A5, A6	A4, A5
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)Known for one	B5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-ISO print media sizesKnown for one	Executive, Folio, Letter, Legal	Unknown — not stated by the source
JIS B-series sizes (B0...B9)Known for one	B5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Envelopes sizesKnown for one	C5, C6, DL	Unknown — not stated by the source
Media weight (tray 1)Known for one	60 - 105 g/m2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum print sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	216 x 356 mm
Network1 differ
Network readyDiffers	No	Yes
Wi-FiKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performance2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	32 MB	64 MB
Maximum internal memoryKnown for one	160 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor modelKnown for one	ARM1020E	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyDiffers	400 MHz	360 MHz
Sound pressure level (printing)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	47 dB
Poweridentical
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	11 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WeightDiffers	8.81 kg	11 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	364 x 369 x 209.6 mm	388 x 313 x 243 mm
Other features1 differ
Power requirementsKnown for one	110 - 127 V, 50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows 2000/XP (32/64 bits), Server 2003 (32/64 bits), Vista (32/64 bits) Mac OS 8.6 - 9.2, OS X 10.1 – 10.5	Windows 2000/ XP/ 2003/ Vista Linux OS Mac OS X 10.3 - 10.5
Power consumption (active)Known for one	500 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
EmulationsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SPL-C
Stand-by LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wireless technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laser printer comparisons

All laser printer comparisons