Product comparison · 2 large format printers

HP DesignJet T870 24-in Printer vs HP PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 21differ
  • 4identical
  • 34known for one product only

Key differences

The HP DesignJet T870 24-in Printer has 1,200 x 1200 DPI more maximum resolution than the HP PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker (2400 x 1200 DPI vs 1200 x 1200 DPI). The HP DesignJet T870 24-in Printer has 1,200 x 1200 DPI more print resolution colour than the HP PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker (2400 x 1200 DPI vs 1200 x 1200 DPI). The HP PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker has 7,168 MB more internal memory than the HP DesignJet T870 24-in Printer (8192 MB vs 1024 MB). Country of origin: China, Thailand on the HP DesignJet T870 24-in Printer, China on the HP PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker. Operating relative humidity (H-H): 20 - 70% on the HP DesignJet T870 24-in Printer, 20 - 80% on the HP PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker.

  • Maximum resolution
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:2400 x 1200 DPI
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:1200 x 1200 DPI
  • Print resolution colour
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:2400 x 1200 DPI
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:1200 x 1200 DPI
  • Internal memory
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:1024 MB
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:8192 MB
  • Country of origin
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:China, Thailand
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:China
  • Power consumption (sleep)
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:2.5 W
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:16 W
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:20 - 70%
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:20 - 80%
  • Width
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:1100 mm
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:1955 mm
  • Depth
    • DesignJet T870 24-in Printer:690 mm
    • PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker:785 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of DesignJet T870 24-in Printer, PageWide XL 4250 40-in Printer with Top Stacker
59 specifications
Printing3 differ
Print technologyKnown for oneThermal inkjetUnknown — not stated by the source
ColourKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum resolutionDiffers2400 x 1200 DPI1200 x 1200 DPI
Print resolution colourDiffers2400 x 1200 DPI1200 x 1200 DPI
Number of print cartridges44
Page description languagesDiffersPDF, HP-GL/2, TIFF, JPEG, HP-RTL, CALS G4, URFHP-GL/2, TIFF, JPEG
Printing coloursKnown for oneCyan, Matte black, Magenta, YellowUnknown — not stated by the source
Print speed (normal quality, A1)Known for one120 pphUnknown — not stated by the source
Copyingidentical
CopyingKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Scanningidentical
ScanningKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper handling1 differ
Maximum print sizeKnown for oneA1 (594 x 841 mm)Unknown — not stated by the source
Paper tray media typesDiffersCoated paper, Plain paper, Bond paper, Photo paper, Matte paper, Banner, Heavy paper, Satin paperBond paper, Recycled paper, Matte paper
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Known for oneA1, A2, A3, A4Unknown — not stated by the source
Cut sheetsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum roll widthKnown for one61 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum roll diameterKnown for one13 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Print margin cut-sheetKnown for one5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Custom media sizesKnown for oneAuto sheet feeder: 210 x 279 to 305 x 457 mm; Manual feed: 210 x 279 to 609 x 1676 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Performance3 differ
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryDiffers1024 MB8192 MB
Country of originDiffersChina, ThailandChina
CertificationDiffersCompliant with Class B requirements, including: USA (FCC rules), Canada (ICES), EU (RED Directive), Australia (ACMA), New Zealand (RSM), China (CCC), Japan (VCCI); Korea (KCC)Compliant with Class A requirements, including: USA (FCC rules), Canada (ICES), EU (EMC Directive), Australia and New Zealand (RCM), Japan (VCCI), Korea (KC)
HP segmentKnown for oneBusinessUnknown — not stated by the source
Brand-specific features2 differ
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Differs199251089299, 199251089305, 199251089312, 199251089329, 199251089336, 199251089343, 199251089350, 199251089367, 199251128356198701864714, 197498854151, 197498854175, 197498854182, 197498854199, 197498854205
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC) with optionsDiffers(AB1) 199251089299; (ABG) 199251089305; (AC4) 199251089312; (ACJ) 199251089329; (AKV) 199251089336; (B19) 199251089343; (B1K) 199251089350; (BCD) 199251089367; (EMU) 199251128356(AB1) 198701864714; (AC4) 197498854151; (AKV) 197498854175; (B19) 197498854182; (B1K) 197498854199; (BCD) 197498854205
HP Dynamic securityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (off)Known for one0.2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (sleep)Differs2.5 W16 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one35 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequency50/60 Hz50/60 Hz
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)5 - 40 °C5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 70%20 - 80%
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 3000 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-25 - 55 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Carbon footprintidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one1028Unknown — not stated by the source
Carbon emissions, manufacturing (kg of CO2e)Known for one745Unknown — not stated by the source
Carbon emissions, logistics (kg of CO2e)Known for one51Unknown — not stated by the source
Carbon emissions, end-of-life (kg of CO2e)Known for one126Unknown — not stated by the source
Total carbon emissions, w/o use phase (kg of CO2e)Known for one106Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers1100 mm1955 mm
DepthDiffers690 mm785 mm
HeightDiffers935 mm1414 mm
WeightDiffers38.5 kg442 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers1310 mm2257 mm
Package depthDiffers570 mm1040 mm
Package heightDiffers640 mm1578 mm
Package weightDiffers48.5 kg596 kg
Bundled softwareKnown for oneHP Click Driver for Windows 11, HP Click App for Windows and Mac, HP App for Windows, Mac, Android and iOS, PartnerLinkUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Electromagnetic compatibilityDiffersCompliant with Class B requirements, including: USA (FCC rules), Canada (ICES), EU (RED Directive), Australia (ACMA), New Zealand (RSM), China (CCC), Japan (VCCI); Korea (KCC)Compliant with Class A requirements, including: USA (FCC rules), Canada (ICES), EU (EMC Directive), Australia and New Zealand (RCM), Japan (VCCI), Korea (KC)
UNSPSC-codeDiffers4321211043212104
Technical detailsidentical
General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) URLKnown for onehttps://support.hp.com/gb-en/product/setup-user-guides/hp-designjet-t870-printer/model/2103136764?sku=AM0X9A ; https://kaas.hpcloud.hp.com/pdf-public/pdf_12236938_en-US-1.pdfUnknown — not stated by the source
Box contentsKnown for oneHP DesignJet T870 Printer, printhead, introductory ink cartridges, printer stand, spindle, guide, warranty flyer, power cordUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More large format printer comparisons

All large format printer comparisons