All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 laptops

Samsung P50-Pro T5500 Tahlia vs Samsung X11-Pro T7400 Brian

Add a product
  • 109specifications compared
  • 28differ
  • 81identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung X11-Pro T7400 Brian has 0.5 GHz more processor frequency than the Samsung P50-Pro T5500 Tahlia (2.16 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The Samsung X11-Pro T7400 Brian has 2 MB more processor cache than the Samsung P50-Pro T5500 Tahlia (4 MB vs 2 MB). The Samsung X11-Pro T7400 Brian has 3 more CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio) than the Samsung P50-Pro T5500 Tahlia (13 vs 10). Only the Samsung X11-Pro T7400 Brian has S/PDIF out port. Only the Samsung P50-Pro T5500 Tahlia has docking connector.

  • Display diagonal
    • 38.1 cm (15")
    • 35.8 cm (14.1")
  • Display resolution
    • 1024 x 768 pixels
    • 1280 x 800 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • 4:3
    • 16:10
  • Processor model
    • T5500
    • T7400
  • Processor frequency
    • 1.66 GHz
    • 2.16 GHz
  • Processor cache
    • 2 MB
    • 4 MB
  • Processor socket
    • Socket 479
    • Socket 478
  • CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)
    • 10
    • 13

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
120 specifications
A

Samsung

P50-Pro T5500 TahliaView product
B

Samsung

X11-Pro T7400 BrianView product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers38.1 cm (15")35.8 cm (14.1")
Display resolutionDiffers1024 x 768 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers4:316:10
Display brightnessKnown for one200 cd/m²
Processor6 differ
Processor modelDiffersT5500T7400
Processor frequencyDiffers1.66 GHz2.16 GHz
Processor cacheDiffers2 MB4 MB
Processor socketDiffersSocket 479Socket 478
Processor seriesDiffersIntel Core 2 Duo T5000 SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo T7000 Series
CPU multiplier (bus/core ratio)Differs1013
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.5 GB2 GB
Memory layout (slots x size)Differs1 x 0.5 GB2 x 1 GB
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers80 GB160 GB
Optical drive typeDiffersDVD Super MultiDVD Super Multi DL
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneMMC, MS Pro, SD, xD
Graphics2 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffersIntel® GMA 950NVIDIA® GeForce® Go 7400
Maximum graphics card memoryDiffers0.128 GB0.256 GB
Maximum resolutionKnown for one2048 x 1536 pixels
Ports & interfaces4 differ
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers43
S/PDIF out portDiffersNoYes
Docking connectorDiffersYesNo
Serial ports quantityDiffers10
Software1 differ
Bundled softwareDiffersAdobe Acrobat Reader Norton AntiVirus-Software (trial) Cyberlink DVD Solution Samsung Network Manager Samsung Smart Screen Samsung EasyBox 2 Samsung Update Plus Samsung Battery Manager Samsung Command Center Firstware Recovery PROFirstware Pro Norton AntiVirus 2005 (trial) Adobe Reader 6 Samsung Network Manager Battery Manager Easy Box
Processor special features3 differ
Embedded options availableDiffersNoYes
Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x)DiffersNoYes
Processor ARK IDDiffers2725327256
Batteryidentical
Battery life (max)Known for one6 h
Poweridentical
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one100/240 V
Securityidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for oneYes
Cable lock slot typeKnown for oneKensington
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers2.7 kg2.1 kg
WidthDiffers329.8 mm339.5 mm
DepthDiffers272 mm257.6 mm
HeightDiffers30.7 mm25.9 mm
Videoidentical
External video modes refresh rate (max)Known for one85 Hz
Other features1 differ
Security featuresKnown for oneFingerPrint
Infrared data portDiffersYesNo
Special featuresKnown for oneAVS now
Modem typeKnown for oneData/Fax V.90

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop comparisons

All laptop comparisons