Product comparison · 2 laptops

HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax vs HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax

Add a product
  • 126specifications compared
  • 19differ
  • 107identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax has 5% more colour gamut than the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax (100% vs 95%). The HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax has 5 cm more display diagonal (metric) than the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax (40.6 cm vs 35.6 cm). The HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax has 5% more DCI-P3 coverage than the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax (100% vs 95%). Only the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax has numeric keypad. Display diagonal: 35.6 cm (14") on the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax, 40.6 cm (16") on the HP OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax.

  • Display diagonal
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:35.6 cm (14")
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:40.6 cm (16")
  • Display glass type
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:Gorilla Glass
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:Edge to Edge Glass
  • Colour gamut
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:95%
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:100%
  • Display diagonal (metric)
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:35.6 cm
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:40.6 cm
  • DCI-P3 coverage
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:95%
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:100%
  • Numeric keypad
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:No
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:Yes
  • HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:821844633120
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:821844633168
  • Weight
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax:1.4 kg
    • OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax:1.85 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 14-kb0502sax, OmniBook X Flip 2-in-1 Laptop Next Gen AI 16-cb0502sax
131 specifications
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers35.6 cm (14")40.6 cm (16")
Display glass typeDiffersGorilla GlassEdge to Edge Glass
Colour gamutDiffers95%100%
Display diagonal (metric)Differs35.6 cm40.6 cm
DCI-P3 coverageDiffers95%100%
Keyboard1 differ
Numeric keypadDiffersNoYes
Brand-specific features1 differ
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Differs821844633120821844633168
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLithium Polymer (LiPo)
Number of battery cellsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 Wh
Battery life (max)Known for one20 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Continuous video playback time (max)Known for one32.5 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WeightDiffers1.4 kg1.85 kg
WidthDiffers313 mm356 mm
DepthDiffers218.5 mm245.5 mm
HeightDiffers14.4 mm15.2 mm
Packaging data3 differ
Package depthDiffers473 mm509 mm
Package heightDiffers271 mm302 mm
Package weightDiffers2.34 kg2.8 kg
Carbon footprint5 differ
Carbon emissions, end-of-life (kg of CO2e)Differs0.5480.615
Carbon emissions, logistics (kg of CO2e)Differs4.8475.535
Carbon emissions, manufacturing (kg of CO2e)Differs248.557212.161
Total carbon emissions, w/o use phase (kg of CO2e)Differs16.43113.76
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs270.383232.071

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop comparisons

All laptop comparisons