Product comparison · 2 laptops

Acer TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G vs Fujitsu AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 5identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH has 1.4 GHz more processor frequency than the Acer TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G (3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Fujitsu AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH has 400 MHz more processor front side bus than the Acer TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G (800 MHz vs 400 MHz). The Fujitsu AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH has 0.5 GB more internal memory than the Acer TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G (1 GB vs 0.5 GB). Display diagonal: 38.1 cm (15") on the Acer TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G, 39.1 cm (15.4") on the Fujitsu AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH. Display resolution: 1400 x 1050 pixels on the Acer TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G, 1280 x 800 pixels on the Fujitsu AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH.

  • Display diagonal
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:38.1 cm (15")
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:39.1 cm (15.4")
  • Display resolution
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:1400 x 1050 pixels
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:1280 x 800 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:4:3
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:16:10
  • Processor frequency
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:1.6 GHz
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:3 GHz
  • Processor front side bus
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:400 MHz
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:800 MHz
  • Internal memory
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:0.5 GB
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:1 GB
  • Total storage capacity
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:40 GB
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:80 GB
  • Discrete graphics card model
    • TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G:AMD Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP
    • AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH:AMD Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of TRAVELMATE 803LCIB CENT-1.6G, AMILO D-1840 P3.0/15.4TFT/1024MB/80GB/DVD+RW/XPH
39 specifications
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers38.1 cm (15")39.1 cm (15.4")
Display resolutionDiffers1400 x 1050 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers4:316:10
Processor2 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers1.6 GHz3 GHz
Processor front side busDiffers400 MHz800 MHz
Memory1 differ
Internal memoryDiffers0.5 GB1 GB
Internal memory typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDDR2-SDRAM
Maximum internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 GB
Storage1 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers40 GB80 GB
HDD speedKnown for one4200 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Graphics2 differ
Discrete graphics card modelDiffersAMD Mobility Radeon 9000 IGPAMD Mobility Radeon 9600 Pro
Maximum graphics card memoryDiffers0.064 GB0.128 GB
Audio1 differ
Audio systemDiffersSoundBlaster-Pro and MS DirectSound compatible2 built-in speakers, built-in microphone, microphone in, headphone out, Hot key volume regulator/ALC655, compliant with AC’97 V2.3/4 analogue line-level stereo inputs with 5-bit volume control, line-in, CD, video, aux
Number of built-in speakersKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Optical driveidentical
CD read speedKnown for one24xUnknown — not stated by the source
CD write speedKnown for one10xUnknown — not stated by the source
CD rewrite speedKnown for one8xUnknown — not stated by the source
DVD write speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4x
DVD rewrite speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.4x
Network1 differ
Networking featuresDiffersEthernet/Fast Ethernet/EEE 802.11b/Bluetooth10/100 Mbps LAN, Optional Wireless LAN module 802.11b
Ports & interfaces1 differ
I/O portsDiffers1 × CardBus type II slot 1 × RJ-11 jack for modem 1 × RJ-45 jack for Ethernet 1 × DC-in jack for AC adapter 1 × ECP/EPP-compliant parallel port 1 × external VGA port 1 × speaker/ headphone/ line-out jack 1 × microphone/ line-in jack 1 × FIR port 1 × IEEE 1394 port 4 × USB 2.0 ports 1 × S-video-out (1 x IEEE 1394, 3 USB 2.0 ports, 1 x S-Video, 1 x Fast Infrared, 1 x memory card slot for MMC/SD/MS, 1 x parallel. 1 x modem, 1 x LAN, 1 x CRT, 1 x microphone in, 1 x line-in, 1 x headphone out (incl. S/PDIF support), built-in microphone, 1 x power supply
Performanceidentical
Motherboard chipsetKnown for oneIntel® 855PMUnknown — not stated by the source
Software2 differ
Bundled softwareDiffersBIOS Set-up, Power-on and HDD passwords, Acer Notebook Manager, Acer Launch Manager, Norton AntiVirus, Adobe Acrobat Reader, CyberLink PowerDVD, NTI CD MakerMicrosoft Windows XP Home Edition, Works Suite 2002 / 2003, Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0, Adobe Photoshop Album 1.0, Norman anti-virus
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMicrosoft Windows XP ProfessionalMicrosoft Windows XP Home Edition
Battery1 differ
Battery life (max)Differs5.5 h2.30 h
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WeightDiffers2.69 kg3.5 kg
WidthKnown for one330 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one272 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs330 x 272 x 29.5 mm358 x 269 x 35.8 mm
Hard driveidentical
Storage drive typeKnown for oneUltra ATA/100Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWidescreen display, Intelligent power management for longer battery life, extensive software package including Works Suite 2003
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 - 35 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop comparisons

All laptop comparisons