Product comparison · 2 laptops

Acer Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB vs Fujitsu AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 6identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Fujitsu AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j has 0.8 GHz more processor frequency than the Acer Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB (2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Acer Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB has 10 GB more total storage capacity than the Fujitsu AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j (40 GB vs 30 GB). The Fujitsu AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j has 0.032 GB more maximum graphics card memory than the Acer Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB (0.064 GB vs 0.032 GB). Display resolution: 1400 x 1050 pixels on the Acer Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB, 1024 x 768 pixels on the Fujitsu AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j. Dimensions (WxDxH): 323 x 265 x 35 mm on the Acer Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB, 345 x 282 x 39 mm on the Fujitsu AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j.

  • Display resolution
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:1400 x 1050 pixels
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:1024 x 768 pixels
  • Processor frequency
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:2 GHz
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:2.8 GHz
  • Total storage capacity
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:40 GB
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:30 GB
  • Maximum graphics card memory
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:0.032 GB
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:0.064 GB
  • CD rewrite speed
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:24x
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:12x
  • Battery life (max)
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:3.5 h
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:2 h
  • Weight
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:2.66 kg
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:3.5 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB:323 x 265 x 35 mm
    • AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j:345 x 282 x 39 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Travelmate 636LC P4 2.0 40GB 512MB, AMILO Celeron 2.8GHz 512MB 30GB HDD CDRW DVD 15i TFT XPH Modem LAN 1 j
23 specifications
Display1 differ
Display resolutionDiffers1400 x 1050 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
Processor1 differ
Processor frequencyDiffers2 GHz2.8 GHz
Processor manufacturerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntel
Processor familyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntel® Celeron®
Storage1 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers40 GB30 GB
Graphics1 differ
Maximum graphics card memoryDiffers0.032 GB0.064 GB
Audioidentical
Audio systemKnown for oneSoundBlaster-Pro and MS DirectSound compatibleUnknown — not stated by the source
Optical drive1 differ
CD rewrite speedDiffers24x12x
CD read speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24x
CD write speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24x
Networkidentical
Networking featuresKnown for oneEthernet/Fast EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows XP Professional/2000Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery1 differ
Battery life (max)Differs3.5 h2 h
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WeightDiffers2.66 kg3.5 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs323 x 265 x 35 mm345 x 282 x 39 mm
Hard driveidentical
Diskette drive memoryKnown for one1.44 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Internal modemKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop comparisons

All laptop comparisons