Product comparison · 2 laptop docks & port replicators

CLUB3D CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black vs Dell DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 7identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black has 1 more HDMI ports quantity than the CLUB3D CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black (1 vs 0). The CLUB3D CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 8.75 Gbit/s more data transfer rate than the Dell DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black (10 Gbit/s vs 1.25 Gbit/s). The CLUB3D CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black has 5.5 mm more width than the Dell DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black (76.5 mm vs 71 mm). Host interface: USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C on the CLUB3D CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C on the Dell DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black. Ethernet LAN data rates: 10000,5000,2500,1000 Mbit/s on the CLUB3D CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black, 2500 Mbit/s on the Dell DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black.

  • HDMI ports quantity
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:0
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:1
  • Ethernet LAN data rates
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:10000,5000,2500,1000 Mbit/s
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:2500 Mbit/s
  • Data transfer rate
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:10 Gbit/s
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:1.25 Gbit/s
  • Width
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:76.5 mm
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:71 mm
  • Depth
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:34 mm
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:71 mm
  • Height
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:15 mm
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:26.2 mm
  • Weight
    • CAC-2531 laptop dock/port replicator Wired USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C Black:42 g
    • DA326 Wired USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C Black:93.5 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CAC-2531, DA326
47 specifications
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Host interfaceDiffersUSB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-CUSB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 W
HDMI ports quantityDiffers01
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.1
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
DisplayPort versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.4
USB Type-C DisplayPort Alternate ModeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Microphone inKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Ethernet LAN data ratesDiffers10000,5000,2500,1000 Mbit/s2500 Mbit/s
Performance1 differ
Data transfer rateDiffers10 Gbit/s1.25 Gbit/s
HD typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6K Ultra HD
Maximum digital resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6016 x 3384 pixels
Number of displays supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Hub interfacesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDisplayPort, HDMI, RJ-45, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (3.1 Gen 2) Type-A
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 11
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMacOS
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mobile operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers76.5 mm71 mm
DepthDiffers34 mm71 mm
HeightDiffers15 mm26.2 mm
WeightDiffers42 g93.5 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one35 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one22 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Cable lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.248 m
Packaging compositionidentical
Paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one22 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Plastic packaging weightKnown for one3 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Total paper/cardboard packaging weightKnown for one0 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Total plastic packaging weightKnown for one0 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one8544 4290Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop docks & port replicators comparisons

All laptop docks & port replicators comparisons