Product comparison · 2 laptop cases

Leitz Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6 vs Leitz Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 11identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

  • Case type
    • Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:Backpack case
    • Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:Messenger case
  • Width
    • Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:310 mm
    • Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:390 mm
  • Depth
    • Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:200 mm
    • Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:155 mm
  • Height
    • Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:460 mm
    • Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:290 mm
  • Weight
    • Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:1.2 kg
    • Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:780 g
  • Volume
    • Backpack laptop Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:16 L
    • Bag laptop Messenger Complete Smart Traveller 15.6:14 L

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 60170095, 60190095
23 specifications
Features1 differ
Case typeDiffersBackpack caseMessenger case
ExpandableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Interior pocketsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCell phone pocket
Shoulder strapKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Protection featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWater resistant
Weight & dimensions5 differ
WidthDiffers310 mm390 mm
DepthDiffers200 mm155 mm
HeightDiffers460 mm290 mm
WeightDiffers1.2 kg780 g
VolumeDiffers16 L14 L
Expanded volumeKnown for one18 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Water bottle holderKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop case comparisons

All laptop case comparisons