Product comparison · 2 laptop cases

Kensington SP80 15.6'' Topload Case vs Thule TSA414 Black

Add a product
  • 24specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 7identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Thule TSA414 Black has 70 mm more width than the Kensington SP80 15.6'' Topload Case (420 mm vs 350 mm). The Thule TSA414 Black has 10 mm more depth than the Kensington SP80 15.6'' Topload Case (110 mm vs 100 mm). The Kensington SP80 15.6'' Topload Case has 20 mm more height than the Thule TSA414 Black (420 mm vs 400 mm). Maximum screen size: 39.6 cm (15.6") on the Kensington SP80 15.6'' Topload Case, 35.6 cm (14") on the Thule TSA414 Black. Case type: Toploader bag on the Kensington SP80 15.6'' Topload Case, Briefcase on the Thule TSA414 Black.

  • Maximum screen size
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:39.6 cm (15.6")
    • TSA414 Black:35.6 cm (14")
  • Case type
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:Toploader bag
    • TSA414 Black:Briefcase
  • Material
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:Nylon
    • TSA414 Black:Polyester
  • Brand compatibility
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:Any brand
    • TSA414 Black:Universal
  • Width
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:350 mm
    • TSA414 Black:420 mm
  • Depth
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:100 mm
    • TSA414 Black:110 mm
  • Height
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:420 mm
    • TSA414 Black:400 mm
  • Weight
    • SP80 15.6'' Topload Case:990 g
    • TSA414 Black:500 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of SP80, TSA414 Black
41 specifications
Features4 differ
Surface colorationMonochromaticMonochromatic
Maximum screen sizeDiffers39.6 cm (15.6")35.6 cm (14")
Case typeDiffersToploader bagBriefcase
MaterialDiffersNylonPolyester
Product main colourBlackBlack
Brand compatibilityDiffersAny brandUniversal
GenderKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUnisex
Consumer life stageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAdult
Integrated compartment(s)YesYes
Tablet compartmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Interior pocketsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness Card, Cell phone pocket, Document pocket, Key pocket, Pen pocket, Tablet pocket, USB-stick pocket, Zip pocket
Exterior pocketsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBack pocket
Back pocket(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Carrying handle(s)YesYes
Removable shoulder strapYesYes
Shoulder strapYesYes
Water-resistant zipperKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Closure typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceZipper
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCambodia
Quantity11
Front pocketKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of front pocketsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Protection featuresKnown for oneDust resistant, Scratch resistant, Shock resistant, Splash proofUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneCEUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WidthDiffers350 mm420 mm
DepthDiffers100 mm110 mm
HeightDiffers420 mm400 mm
WeightDiffers990 g500 g
Notebook compartment dimensions (W x D x H)Differs300 x 40 x 380 mm330 x 15 x 230 mm
Package widthDiffers390 mm420 mm
Package depthDiffers460 mm85 mm
Package heightDiffers90 mm400 mm
Package weightKnown for one1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data5 differ
Master (outer) case widthDiffers419 mm340 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers195 mm370 mm
Master (outer) case heightDiffers387 mm330 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers5.81 kg4.42 kg
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers5 pc(s)4 pc(s)
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one84733080Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one50085896625648Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Suitable forKnown for oneLaptopUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop case comparisons

All laptop case comparisons