All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 laptop cases

iDeal of Sweden Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods vs Thule TCAM6115 Seneca Rock

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 21differ
  • 5identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The iDeal of Sweden Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods has 2 more front pockets than the Thule TCAM6115 Seneca Rock (3 vs 1). The Thule TCAM6115 Seneca Rock has 260 mm more width than the iDeal of Sweden Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods (300 mm vs 40 mm). The iDeal of Sweden Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods has 170 mm more depth than the Thule TCAM6115 Seneca Rock (390 mm vs 220 mm). Only the iDeal of Sweden Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods has removable shoulder strap. Case type: Messenger case on the iDeal of Sweden Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods, Backpack on the Thule TCAM6115 Seneca Rock.

  • Case type
    • Messenger case
    • Backpack
  • Material
    • Faux leather, Leather
    • Nylon, Recycled polyester
  • Product main colour
    • Green
    • Grey
  • Exterior pockets
    • Front pocket
    • Front pocket, Side pocket
  • Number of front pockets
    • 3
    • 1
  • Removable shoulder strap
    • Yes
    • No
  • Country of origin
    • China
    • Vietnam
  • Width
    • 40 mm
    • 300 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
46 specifications
A

iDeal of Sweden

Unity Messenger Laptop Bag Metal Woods

Model IDMLBAW20-235

View product
B

Thule

TCAM6115 Seneca RockView product
Features8 differ
Surface colorationMonochromaticMonochromatic
Case typeDiffersMessenger caseBackpack
MaterialDiffersFaux leather, LeatherNylon, Recycled polyester
Product main colourDiffersGreenGrey
Brand compatibilityUniversalUniversal
CompatibilityKnown for oneUniversal
Interior pocketsDiffersZip pocketCell phone pocket, Document pocket, Pen pocket
Exterior pocketsDiffersFront pocketFront pocket, Side pocket
Number of front pocketsDiffers31
Carrying handle(s)YesYes
Removable shoulder strapDiffersYesNo
Shoulder strapYesYes
Country of originDiffersChinaVietnam
Quantity11
Maximum screen sizeKnown for one40.6 cm (16")
GenderKnown for oneUnisex
Consumer life stageKnown for oneAdult
Front pocketKnown for oneYes
Product made with recycled materialsKnown for oneYes
Product recycled materialsKnown for oneRecycled polyester
Overall recycled contentKnown for one100%
Closure typeKnown for oneZipper
Weight & dimensions8 differ
WidthDiffers40 mm300 mm
DepthDiffers390 mm220 mm
HeightDiffers180 mm450 mm
WeightDiffers1.14 kg570 g
Notebook compartment dimensions (W x D x H)Differs365 x 25 x 270 mm348 x 25 x 243 mm
Package widthDiffers40 mm320 mm
Package depthDiffers390 mm50 mm
Package heightDiffers180 mm500 mm
Package weightKnown for one1.32 kg
VolumeKnown for one20 L
Technical detailsidentical
PatternKnown for oneAnimal pattern
Logistics data5 differ
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one4202121100
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one6 pc(s)
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for one43 cm
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for one50.5 cm
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for one38 cm
Master (outer) case widthDiffers525 mm478 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers790 mm175 mm
Master (outer) case heightDiffers460 mm328 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers17.4 kg2.57 kg
Products per master (outer) caseDiffers12 pc(s)3 pc(s)
Master (outer) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one7340196225492
Shipping (inner) case GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one7340196225485
Shipping (inner) case gross weightKnown for one8.45 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop case comparisons

All laptop case comparisons