Product comparison · 2 laptop cases

Hama 00222053 laptop case vs Targus Groove X2

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 5identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00222053 laptop case has 280 mm more width than the Targus Groove X2 (440 mm vs 160 mm). The Targus Groove X2 has 220 mm more depth than the Hama 00222053 laptop case (310 mm vs 90 mm). The Targus Groove X2 has 105 mm more height than the Hama 00222053 laptop case (425 mm vs 320 mm). Only the Hama 00222053 laptop case has expandable. Only the Hama 00222053 laptop case has removable shoulder strap.

  • Maximum screen size
    • 00222053 laptop case:41.1 cm (16.2")
    • Groove X2:38.1 cm (15")
  • Case type
    • 00222053 laptop case:Trolley case
    • Groove X2:Backpack
  • Product main colour
    • 00222053 laptop case:Beige, Black
    • Groove X2:Navy
  • Brand compatibility
    • 00222053 laptop case:Universal
    • Groove X2:Apple
  • Expandable
    • 00222053 laptop case:Yes
    • Groove X2:No
  • Removable shoulder strap
    • 00222053 laptop case:Yes
    • Groove X2:No
  • Protection features
    • 00222053 laptop case:Water repellent
    • Groove X2:UV resistant
  • Width
    • 00222053 laptop case:440 mm
    • Groove X2:160 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00222053, Groove X2
45 specifications
Features8 differ
Maximum screen sizeDiffers41.1 cm (16.2")38.1 cm (15")
Case typeDiffersTrolley caseBackpack
MaterialDiffersPolyethylene terephthalate (PET)Polyester
Linear mass densityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 D
Product main colourDiffersBeige, BlackNavy
Brand compatibilityDiffersUniversalApple
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMacBook 15” & Laptops up to 15”
ExpandableDiffersYesNo
Removable shoulder strapDiffersYesNo
Protection featuresDiffersWater repellentUV resistant
USB charging portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
GenderKnown for oneUnisexUnknown — not stated by the source
Consumer life stageKnown for oneAllUnknown — not stated by the source
Tablet compartmentKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Headphones compartmentKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Keyboard compartmentKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Exterior pocketsKnown for oneFront pocketUnknown — not stated by the source
Shoulder strapKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product made with recycled materialsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product recycled materialsKnown for oneRecycled polyesterUnknown — not stated by the source
Closure typeKnown for oneZipperUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions9 differ
WidthDiffers440 mm160 mm
DepthDiffers90 mm310 mm
HeightDiffers320 mm425 mm
WeightDiffers440 g610 g
Notebook compartment dimensions (W x D x H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source247 x 359 x 18 mm
VolumeDiffers10 L27 L
Package widthDiffers440 mm170 mm
Package depthDiffers325 mm310 mm
Package heightDiffers45 mm420 mm
Package weightDiffers463 g600 g
Packaging contentidentical
Mouse includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84733080
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source55 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source440 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source620 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source320 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.07 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneForest Stewardship Council (FSC)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop case comparisons

All laptop case comparisons